Book Reviews: by J. Michael Smith, 2021-22

Books Read in October and November 2022

Atkinson, Rick, The British Are Coming:  The War for America, Lexington to Princeton, 1775-1777, Volume One of the Revolution Trilogy  (history, American Revolution, winner of the Pulitzer Prize)

Berry, Wendell, A Place on Earth (novel/short stories, rural Kentucky)

Brown, David S., The First Populist:  The Defiant Life of Andrew Jackson (presidential biography, reflection on personality and democracy)

Ferrer, Ada, Cuba: An American History (history of Cuba and the nations that effected it)

Grisham, John, The Boys from Biloxi (novel, legal, crime, politics)

Klaus, Carl, H., A Self Made of Words:  Crafting a Distinctive Persona in Nonfiction Writing (craft of writing)

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne’s House of Dreams (novel #5 in the Anne of Green Gables Series)

Montgomery, Lucy M.  Anne of Ingleside (novel #6 of the Anne of Green Gables Series)

Pawlish, Renee, This Doesn’t Happen in the Movies, The Reed Ferguson Mystery Series, Book 1 (detective mystery novel)

Pietrusza, David, Roosevelt Sweeps the Nation:  FDR’s Landslide and the Triumph of the Liberal Ideal (history, American elections, biography)

Scott, Dale, The Umpire is Out: Calling the Game and Living My True Self (memoir, baseball)

Atkinson, Rick, The British Are Coming:  The War for America, Lexington to Princeton, 1775-1777, Volume One of the Revolution Trilogy  (history, American Revolution, winner of the Pulitzer Prize)

Everything is excellent about this book.  It includes original material, as the author is the first to have access to the private diaries and papers of King George III.  It draws heavily on other original sources, primarily diaries and letters from both Americans and British soldiers and citizens.  It includes (although not extensively) the political conditions in both London and the American colonies.  The author’s extensive military knowledge and readable accounts of battles are supplemented by some of the best maps found in any historical book.  

In addition, Atkinson is one of the finest prose writers to be found in any genre of literature.  His vocabulary and twist of phrase, his understated sense of humor, and his poignant summary paragraphs are a reading pleasure.

This is the first volume of Atkinson’s Revolutionary War Trilogy, and I look forward to reading the other two volumes as soon as they are published.

On a personal level, one of the truths of the Revolutionary War that struck me, brought out by Atkinson, was the inhumanity and violence of the conflict. Added to the extreme challenges of weather and nearly zero technology when it came to communication, the hardships endured by fighters on both sides (as well as civilians caught in the middle) is virtually unfathomable to me.  (And I have a pretty good imagination.)  Winter marches over snow and ice with no shoes, men reduced to eating spoiled pork, rats crawling over bodies while sleeping, amputations without pain killers, and night marches with days of no sleep were the norm.  Honorable treatment of prisoners only extended to a few officers. Ordinary prisoners of war died at an alarming rate.

Atkinson does a good job of describing how the British had to fight not only an army, but also a nation of people who felt aggrieved.  The British had to conquer, American only had to endure.  This dynamic would be reversed in many wars the United States would enter during the 20th and 21st centuries.

Atkinson also gives us a realistic picture of George Washington.  He traces Washington’s development from an arrogant, condescending general who arrived outside Boston after Lexington and Concord, to a man who grew to respect his troops and develop a bonding with them as the war continued.  He also learned to rely on others for advice, took bold action when needed, kept his cool in almost all circumstances, blocked out his conscience when it came time to send others to their deaths, applied administrative genius to his work, and learned from his military mistakes.  

A quote from near the end of the book: “Certainly Washington’s (first) eighteen months in command had brought bitter lessons:  that war was rarely linear, preferring a path of fits and starts, ups and downs; triumphs and cataclysms; that only battle could reveal those with the necessary dark heart for killing, years of killing; that only those with the requisite stamina, aptitude, and luck would be able to see it through; and finally—the hardest of war’s hard truths—that for a new nation to live, young men must die, often alone, usually in pain, and sometimes to no obvious purpose.  He, more than anyone, would be responsible for ordering those men to their deaths.”  (pg. 553)

Berry, Wendell, A Place on Earth (novel/short stories, rural Kentucky)

A Place on Earth is vintage Wendell Berry, full of rich characters, poignant insights about life, and deep engagement with nature. While this is easily a stand-alone novel, it also features familiar characters and places in Berry’s other stories. Port William is a small Kentucky village just up from the river. This novel is set during World War II and features Mat and Margaret Feltner, whose son is missing in action. Their pregnant daughter-in-law lives with them, and gives birth to their now fatherless grandchild. We get the story of how the local barber, Jayber Crow, takes on the additional duties of grave-digger. There is an insightful portrait of the local pastor, who cannot bring himself to be humble and human in situations of human grief. Burley Coulter, another character in Berry’s stories appears at full strength in this novel: his intelligence, his rebellion, his likability.

Like most of Berry’s work, he doesn’t hesitate to walk through darkness and unthinkable grief. He does so slowly, with grace, and with kindness. There are dark moments here: the death of a child in a flood, the death of a young man in the war, the suicide of a middle aged man who cannot stand the emptiness of his life. They are told with imagination, empathy, and spaciousness.

Life is exposed here, in all its embarrassment, pain, and comedy, handled forthrightly, gently, and in context by Berry. He has long been one of my favorite authors, and this book lives up to my hopes and expectations.

Brown, David S., The First Populist:  The Defiant Life of Andrew Jackson (presidential biography, reflection on personality and democracy)

I’ve read several books on Andrew Jackson and have found him a man of extraordinary strength and luck, and an individual deeply flawed, who left a questionable effect on United States history.  Brown’s book didn’t improve my liking for Jackson.  

As an historical scholar, Brown is a bit suspect.  He wants to make a point, a valid point, but he tells Jackson’s story in such a way as to serve his point, not necessarily the whole truth.  Nevertheless, Brown isn’t wrong.  

Jackson survived a childhood that was traumatic and violent.  He saw both his brother and mother killed as a consequence of British behavior during the Revolutionary War.  He was driven by the fires of both hatred and violence.  As an owner of slaves, an Indian fighter, a duelist, and a commander who sent several of his soldiers to the firing squad, Jackson trafficked in violence his whole life.  It was his answer to nearly every challenge.  

But he also had an intelligence and an intuition that made him highly successful.  Unfortunately, that brilliant mind was generally applied to his own advancement.  His political positions were consistent only to the extent that they served his own advancement.  

He was the first president to utterly disregard the constitution’s balance of power arrangement.  Jackson defied both congress and the Supreme Court.  We continue to see how fraught those attitudes are in our own recent presidents.

Brown finishes his book with brief mentions of the relationship between Trump and Jackson.  He also links Theodore Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, Richard Nixon, and Lyndon Johnson, but offers no evidence. 

As I was reading Brown’s book, I kept thinking of Donald Trump (not the first time I’ve noticed similarities between Trump and Jackson.  While not nearly as intelligent as Jackson, (but just as intuitive), Donald Trump has much of Andrew Jackson’s mindset. The public anger that both Jackson and Trump tapped into is similar.  Both appealed to a citizenry that felt neglected and marginalized by the elite.  The personality flaws of both were seen as assets rather than liabilities in the fight against the elite.   

Ferrer, Ada, Cuba: An American History (history of Cuba and the nations that effected it)

How can I be an American in my late 60s and have never read anything substantial about Cuban history before this book? I’ve always had an awareness that those of us from the United States are not the only “Americans.” But still, I’ve been oblivious to the effects my government and my people have had on our nearest neighbors.

Ferrer’s book is about the history of Cuba, with a special emphasis on the role of Spanish colonialism, U.S. Manifest Destiny, and Soviet authoritarianism on Cuban history. In every one of these international relationships, Cubans suffered grievous injustices. The most powerful suppression of Cuba came from the U.S., its super-power neighbor. Many U.S. politicians in the 1800s lusted after Cuban statehood. In the 1900s, the Platt Amendment, passed by the U.S. Congress insisted on the right of the U.S. to intervene in Cuba anytime it deemed necessary. For half a century, the U.S. controlled every facet of Cuban government, economy, and social life. U.S. citizens, under the protection of the Platt Amendment, bought up all the best land and businesses in Cuba.

Slavery dominated Cuban history, and even after it was outlawed, racial discrimination continued there as it did in the U.S. Ferrer paints a compelling narrative of how blacks have been treated in Cuba, and it makes an informative and thoughtful read as we consider the racial injustices in the U.S.

In the 1800s, a number of Cubans rose up to try and throw off the shackles of Spain. By the end of that century, a successful movement was initiated by Jose Marti and his partners. Based in exile in the U.S., Marti organized a revolution that would free Cuba not only from Spain, but also U.S. control. Even though he was cut down in the war in 1895, his movement continued to be effective in ending Spanish rule. Only when it appeared that the Cubans would gain independence on their own did the U.S. decide to intervene, thus precipitating the Spanish-American War. Ferrer asserts that the U.S. did little to drive out a weakened and declining Spain, (The Cubans had already done all the heavy lifting) but jumped in at the last minute in order to gain control over Cuba and other Spanish colonies (e.g. the Philippines.) Her account is thorough enough that the burden of proof is now on those who still insist that the U.S. is the only reason Cuba is free from Spain. I’d be interested in hearing their argument.

It is indisputable that once the U.S. gained control in Cuba, they took over sugar plantations, dictated to the government, kept black Cubans in their place (courtesy of southern U.S. politicians), increased the gap between the wealthy and the poor, and used Cuba as a refuge for all the gambling, prostitution, liquor, and organized crime that was illegal in the U.S. itself.

By the 1940s, Cuba was chaffing for economic and political reform. A new constitution was passed, over the objections of the U.S. government. But the leaders elected under that constitution soon caved to U.S. pressure and sank into corruption. Elections were fraught with fraud and assassinations.

In 1948, as Carlos Prio Socorro prepared to take the oath as president, the outgoing minister of education, Jose Manuel Aleman, organized a caravan of four green GM trucks to travel to the treasury building, where he and several men loaded several suitcases with money from the vaults: pesos, pounds, francs, rubles, lire, and dollars. Aleman headed straight for the airport, boarded a DC-3, and flew to Miami. He had $19 million dollars on him. When customs officials stopped him, he told them to call Washington, where officials there decided there was no law against bringing so much money into the U.S. The money never was returned to the Cuban people.

The native Cubans who were elected to office were either incompetent or corrupt. Ferrer relates numerous stories about such leaders as Gerardo Machado, Ramos Grau San Martin, and Fulgencio Batista. Eventually, by the late 1950s, she reports on the emergence of Fidel Castro.

Ferrer’s work on Castro is excellent historiography. She helps us see clearly why he came to power. She also gives a balanced report of his strengths, his legitimacy, his illusions, his ruthlessness, and his effect on Cuba. In addition, she makes clear that American officials, especially in the Kennedy administration, had a myopic understanding of both Cuba and Castro, primarily due to the lingering effects of Manifest Destiny in the sixties, the same blindness that led to Viet Nam.

There is an excellent narrative on the relationship between the Soviet Union and Cuba, as well as Cuban involvement in Angola. Ferrer makes clear that by allowing itself to become so dependent on Cuba, Castro once again made the perennial mistake of allowing his resource-limited country to be controlled and humiliated by a foreign power.

The book ends with the death of Castro, the unique Obama approach to Cuban/US relations, and the reversing of Obama’s policies by Trump. Her closing paragraphs are a work of literary beauty. She directs her attention to sculptor Teodoro Ramos Blanco (1902-1972). His monuments and works are found throughout Cuba and the United States. They represent not only the famous but the millions of forgotten Cubans who shaped that country’s story. Ferrer writes on page 468: “History…is also the countless lives that are nestled in its sway. Consider all the people who may have lived at some point during Cuba’s long history, from before the arrival of Christopher Columbus to the present. Every one of those lives embodies and condenses the history that made it. The large-scale events of history–conquest, enslavement, revolution, war–ripple through individual lives, shaping them like so much stone or clay. As history makes people, so do people make history, reworking it, day by day, creating meaning of the world around them, often acting in ways that tend to fit but awkwardly in the categories of epic history.”

This book, published in 2022, won Ferrer a Pulitzer Prize. I can see why. She currently teaches history and Latin American Studies at New York University. I look forward to more books from her.

Grisham, John, The Boys from Biloxi (novel, legal, crime, politics)

I read Grisham novels when I’m looking for a break from everything else in my life.  His characters, plot, and suspense are compelling, and he’s always a quick and easy read for me, a great diversion.

This is one of the best of his novels.  Involving a crime syndicate along the Mississippi coast and a young district attorney determined to clean up the area, the plot turns deadly.  The novel features murder for hire, a corrupt sheriff, cowed state and federal officials, prostitution, gambling, drinking, drugs, and weapons trafficking.  It also features two boys who grow up friends, playing baseball together, and talking about shared future dreams.  But the two boys both take after their fathers:  one a syndicate boss, the other a crusading prosecutor.  As the book reaches its climax, the two are mortal enemies.

Grisham novels are plots without story:  in other words, the characters really don’t change much in the course of his books.  Some go through some inner turmoil, but they don’t ever grow.  This novel is no exception.  Don’t look for any good human insights here.  It’s a fast, fun read though.

In a couple places, the novel is poorly edited, seeming to skip a page or two, as the plot changes abruptly.  It normally moves along smoothly but for these exceptions.  The only other technical problem is an inconsistent point of view in a couple places.  We read the novel from the point of view of the protagonists.  But in one place Grisham shifts to the point of view of the antagonist, for no good reason.  It’s a little disconcerting in an otherwise well written book.

Klaus, Carl, H., A Self Made of Words:  Crafting a Distinctive Persona in Nonfiction Writing (craft of writing)

I was motivated to read this short book in order to give more thought to the “persona” I convey in my nonfiction writings.  People who read my Sunday Posts report being as attracted to the persona as to the content.  In every piece of nonfiction we write, we reveal a portion of our personality, our persona.  We can either be intentional or unintentional in making that reveal.  Klaus gets us thinking about the “self” we reveal in our writing and shows us techniques for either concealing or revealing more.  

Different kinds of writing call for revealing different aspects of ourselves.  I show more personality in my Sunday Posts than I do in an academic paper, where I reveal more of how the left side of my brain works. 

The most helpful take from this book came in considering the impact of three kinds of writing:  colloquial, informal, and formal.  As a pastor, I’m often stuck in formal writing at those moments when I’m trying to be most instructive and persuasive about important issues.  But this book helped me see that the people I’m usually trying to persuade are usually much more responsive to my colloquial style. I hope to use some of his techniques for improving those kinds of writing.

The book is short, but tedious many places.  Klaus uses variations of the same autobiographical anecdote over and over to illustrate various points he wants to make.  It is hard to stay interested. 

But I got out of the book what I came for, and for that I’m pleased.

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne’s House of Dreams (novel #5 in the Anne of Green Gables Series)

There is an emerging maturity in this fifth novel of the Anne of Green Gables series. As Anne (the protagonist) herself matures in perspective and discipline, so the author (Montgomery) seems to be developing her own skills as a writer, particularly in her ability to put a twist in the plot, her capacity to be sympathetic with eccentric characters, and her deployment of imagination to add richness to the stories her characters face.

New and unforgettable characters we encounter in this novel include Captain Jim (the wise and gentle man man of the sea who tends the nearby lighthouse in his old age), Miss Cornelia (the staunch Presbyterian, man-blaming, spinster whom we only like because Anne like’s her), Leslie Moore (the mysterious, gorgeous golden haired woman with a life full of secrets and a spirit and strength as great as any character in this series), and the Moore cousins, Dick and George (who create great confusion in the middle of the novel), and Owen (a brilliant author who finds his place in the lives of the people on the shores of Four-Winds-Point.

The setting of the novel is in the first year of Anne and Gilbert’s marriage, also his first year as doctor in the village and region of Glen St. Mary (which includes Four-Winds-Point.) Once again, this is a delightful and spirit calming read from Lucy Montgomery.

Montgomery, Lucy M.  Anne of Ingleside (novel #6 of the Anne of Green Gables Series)

I really disliked this book.  Since reading book one of the series (Anne of Green Gables) I was thrilled to know that there were eight books in the series.  None has been as good as the first.  But this novel hit bottom.  I’m trying to decide whether to read the last two.

What’s so bad?  First of all, the book has no protagonist.  We are misled into thinking it will be another book about Anne, the character who walked into our hearts and imagination in book one.  But in this volume, Anne, now with five kids, has faded to the background and become unrecognizable.  She is reduced to a “spear-carrier” in the book, and might just as well remain nameless.  

When she does appear, she has become a caricature of the very people who were her antagonists in earlier volumes.  She is now an elitist doctor’s wife, who looks condescendingly on other children in the town, and seems caught up in material things rather than relationships.  The portrait of her and Gilbert, her husband, is as shallow as a portrayal of a mother and father in a first grade reader.

The book parades a number of eccentric characters who seem too one dimensional and ridiculous to be real.  Each oddball only appears only in one chapter, usually, but we can’t wait to get to the next chapter to get rid of them.  

One of the most disturbing things about the novel is Montgomery’s portrayal of children.  In most chapters, one of Anne’s children is the subject of an anecdote. The author finds the emotional suffering of children entertaining. She puts them through a number of abusive situations, and then diminishes the emotional impact on them.  Granted this was written before the advent of child psychology as a field of study, but Montgomery has no excuse for the way she diminishes children in this book:  she has already shown us great insight into children in the first volumes of this series.

The values that shown through in “Anne of Green Gables” are entirely missing here.  Instead we see gossips, the upper crust of society, and stereotypes abounding and glorified.

This was the last book Montgomery wrote for this series, even though it comes sixth in the chronology of Anne’s life.  We now know from family recollections that Montgomery was depressed near the end of her life, an untimely ending just 3 years after this was written.  Perhaps the dramatic loss of standard is due to an emotional crisis within Montgomery herself.  But when I introduce the series to my grandchildren, I’ll not give them volume 6.

Pawlish, Renee, This Doesn’t Happen in the Movies, The Reed Ferguson Mystery Series, Book 1 (detective mystery novel)

The blurb on Amazon urging me to buy this book for $2.99 was very well written. I’d give it five stars, maybe more. On occasion, however, you get what you pay for in a book, sometimes less.

I rated the book a two because I read the author’s blurb on her website and she seems like she’d be a really nice neighbor, probably a great friend. But she needs to take a good writing class, and probably add some actual writing friends to her social life.

This mystery novel has no story. By that, I mean that there is no inner journey being taken by anyone in the book. All the characters are flat and human-less, robotically reacting to events around them, growthless through the book—in other words, boring.

While the book gives us no story, it certainly has plot—predictable, inane, copied-from-television-shows plot. The situations that arise in the novel seem unrealistic, which is okay if readers are rewarded for suspending their disbelief. They aren’t. For example, the X-Women, a secret group that kidnaps and kills men who abuse women, (undetectable by the frantic FBI trying to find them,) seems utterly incompetent when we finally get a peek into their personnel and organization. If you’re going to have a villain in your story, make them competent.

If I were teaching a class on writing a novel, I might use this book in a lab to explore how not to develop characters or write dialogue. There are no real characters in this book, only thin caricatures. And their dialogue reinforces their unrelatability. The protagonist, Reed Ferguson, is a shiftless rich boy who decides to become a detective. He has neither the training nor the wit to be one, only bullheadedness. His ability to solve the mystery of this novel is only due to outside luck, not any method or intelligence of his own. He has no ambitions, no compelling desires, no commitment to anyone or anything, and no maturity. He reminds me of a numbed out adolescent boy marking time. He never changes in this book.

His client, Amanda, is a sad, gorgeous, alcoholic psychopath. She also has borderline personality disorder, even though the author doesn’t seem to know it. Amanda has stupidly decided to hire someone to kill her jerk of a husband, paying half a million to get the job done so she can get the other 5 million or so. She hires the X-Women to do it. When the husband escapes getting offed, she hires Reed to figure out what happened. Reed discovers her crime but continues to loyally work for her.

The author likes Reed, but we don’t so much. Amanda is pathetic, not interesting, and we never learn anything that would help us understand her. Reed’s brilliant friend Cal is a computer recluse who never goes out in public and has bad hygiene. Not attractive to the reader. Reed’s nagging, hyper-anxious mother appears from time to time in the novel for comic relief, but the author disrespects her, and I can’t figure out which one I want to scold more—the mother or the author. The police and the FBI agents are uncaring and stupid, unflattering stereotypes. The beautiful girl across the street, Willie, seems strangely attracted to Reed by the end of the novel, making me want to warn her about making bad choices in men.

A good novel requires real characters. The protagonist must be hungry but flawed, required to grow and change or fail. The characters must be agents that effect the story. This book is just a coincidence of accidents and bumbling.

In a good novel, something in the main character must die, symbolically, if the story is to move forward. The only “symbolic death” Reed experiences is getting shot in the butt. But instead of teaching him a lesson, his new butt hole just results in him getting to lie around on his couch for a week and let others wait on him.

This book was an opportunity for the author to enlighten us on several issues: bipolar disorder, abuse, males who never grow up, the effect of cheating husbands, underground revenge groups, etc. But this author never did the research to know enough to inform us. The book was also an opportunity to develop a theme—redemption, justice, infidelity, healing, becoming an adult… But again, the author took a pass on all that and just stretched a mindless one-hour TV crime drama into a book.

I thought several times about putting the book down and not finishing. But this was such a perfect example of how not to write a novel that I couldn’t let go. My sincere apologies to the author, with this word of encouragement: keep at it, but don’t be like Reed Ferguson, who depends on accidents and unforeseen luck to get his work done. Do the homework and it will show itself in future works.

Pietrusza, David, Roosevelt Sweeps the Nation:  FDR’s Landslide and the Triumph of the Liberal Ideal (history, American elections, biography)

The 1936 presidential election was a blowout.  FDR won 46 states, all but Maine and Vermont.  His popular vote total was over 60%.  At first glance, such a blowout seems like it makes a pretty boring story.  But there was much more suspense, hostility, and chaos than even U.S. recent elections feature.  

The 1936 election took place in the midst of the Great Depression.  Unemployment was still 15%.  Many of Roosevelt’s solutions had been thrown out by the Supreme Court.  He was accused of being a communist by many, a fascist by even more.  While there is plenty to like about FDR, in retrospect, there were also aspects to his personality that would have given me second thoughts about voting for him.  

No one knew yet how (or whether) the economy would recover.  Populists such as Father Coughlin and Huey Long were whipping up emotion, usually at FDR’s expense.  FDR’s own Vice President, John Nance Garner, thought he was far too liberal for the country.  There was turmoil in the black community, especially since Roosevelt had awful attitudes about Blacks, and even worse policies.  For example, he excluded many blacks from getting social security, in order to keep his southern base happy.

Communists and Socialists were thriving in America.  On the international horizon, communism was becoming more dangerous in the Soviet Union and Hitler was gaining power in Germany.  There was cause for alarm and preparation, and yet Americans were growing increasingly isolationist.

FDR’s opponent was Alf Landon, governor of Kansas.  Landon goes down as one of the most incompetent presidential candidates in the history of the U.S.  Pietrusza’s chapters on him are amusing.

My have two problems with the book.  First, Pietrusza spends a little too much time on some of the minor characters in the election.  While giving us a good picture of the uncertainties and chaos of the 36 election, I think we could have heard more about Roosevelt and Landon.  There was quite a bit of space, however, devoted to William Randolph Hearst, Gerald Smith, Norman Thomas, and Earl Browder.  

My second problem was that the author got a little too cute and condescending from time to time.  An author’s humor can either facilitate a good read, or distract.  On occasion Pietrusza’s humor distracted.  

Scott, Dale, The Umpire is Out: Calling the Game and Living My True Self (memoir, baseball)

Dale Scott was a major league umpire between 1985 and 2017. The book is his memoir, mostly of his career, but also a little of his personal life. I enjoyed the book on two fronts: first as a baseball fan. Second, Scott has an interesting personality, and that came through in his memoir. 

What rattled me a little were his brutal opinions about a number of players, coaches, and league officials that he didn’t like. He liked most of his fellow umpires, but not all. Scott doesn’t give an inch when it comes to the Ripkins, Billy Martin, Roger Clemons, etc. During a game argument with Cal Ripken, Sr., for example, Scott told him, “The only reason you’re a major league manager is because you had two good nights with Mrs. Ripkin.” It is a gossipy book, and we do like good gossip. 

The job of an umpire is to be ruthlessly accurate. And so Scott is as he recounts players, games, and bizarre situations through his years as an umpire. The memoir gives good insight into the life, financial situation, and labor issues big league umpires encounter. Scott worked through several radical changes in the game and provides some historical perspective.

We learn a few things about Scott as a person: about his parents, his husband, his being the first major league umpire to come out of the closet, his discouragements at he beginning of the career, his attitude toward “booing the ump,” his feelings about being assaulted by millionaire players and coaches during game arguments, his politics, his time umpiring in the Dominican, his views about technology replacing umpiring, and his concern for sustaining dangerous injuries while working behind the plate (the reason for his retirement.)

It’s especially a good read for those of us who have been long-time baseball fans.

Books Read in August and September 2022

Grisham, John, The Judge’s List (crime novel)

Isenburg, Nancy, and Burstein, Andrew, The Problem of Democracy: The Presidents Adams Confront the Cult of Personality (presidential biography, political science, democracy)

Jenkins, Jerry, Dead Sea Rising (novel)

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of Avonlea (novel #2 in Anne of Green Gables series)

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of Green Gables (novel #1 in Anne of Green Gables series)

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of the Island (novel #3 in Anne of Green Gables series)

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of Windy Poplars (novel #4 in Anne of Green Gables series)

Smith, Beverly, A Land No Map Can Find (novel)

Weir, Andy, Project Hail Mary (science fiction)

Widmer, Ted, Martin Van Buren (presidential biography)


Grisham, John, The Judge’s List (crime novel)

I read about one Grisham novel a year, especially when I’m fatigued. In this novel, Grisham does the heavy lifting for me… pulling me through his story with well-crafted suspense and captivating characters. A judge has been killing off people who offended him at some point in his life and is so talented at his hobby that he leaves no evidence. A daughter of one of his victims finds the “thread,” however, and connects multiple murders to him. She secures the services of an unlikely detective–an investigator of judicial misconduct who has never handled a violent crime situation before. But she gets shamed into taking up the variety of cold cases that the victim’s relative has put together for her. Some suspension of disbelief is required to enjoy the book, but it is a fast and refreshing read.

Isenburg, Nancy, and Burstein, Andrew, The Problem of Democracy: The Presidents Adams Confront the Cult of Personality (presidential biography, political science, democracy)

This is the second book Isenberg and Burstein have written coupling two presidents so we could see how one illuminates the other. (Their other book is on Jefferson and Madison.) Their motive for writing the book on the Presidents Adams is to explore their belief and critique of democracy. Referring to such concepts as “impersonation of democracy,” “unchecked democratic posturing and pretense,” and the role of “glitter” in democratic elections, the authors turn to two of history’s most astute political scientists (the Presidents Adams) to find better understanding regarding the political dysfunctions present in the United States today.

The book contains two excellent biographies, one of John Adams (JA) and one of his son, John Quincy Adams (JQA). The quality of the biographies is rooted in the authors’ sympathy for their subjects, their critical eye, and their careful exploration of original source material, particularly the extensive diaries and letters of both men.

My interest in the book was enhanced by the promise of learning the Adamses’ take on “democracy.” We are, after all, being warned about the death of democracy some observers of today’s political scene.

For years I have engaged in healthy debates with my Chinese friends over the qualities of democracy vs. authoritarianism. But in recent years, with elections giving us too many inadequate leaders, I am having a harder time making the argument for democracy. Countries adhering to democracy haven’t done so well in resolving issues of environmental disaster, immigration, racism, gender-related rights, moral stability, election integrity, domestic violence, crime, international influence, public health policies, healthcare, economic recovery from COVID, or management of wealth and poverty.

Isenberg and Burstein found much in the writings of JA and JQA to remind us that “democracy” is not an infallible god. The Adamses believed it was both necessary to good government AND vulnerable to multiple abuses. The Adamses offer checks and balances to democracy.

John Adams referred to a “free government,” one that collects advice from the people, offers free access to the people, and encourages free communication of the people’s wants, knowledge, projects, and wishes. (pg. 108) Several elements are essential to “free government”: freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and press; education, town meetings to learn of local issues, vital churches, and local militia. These local activities provide a training ground for responsible participation in government. Democracy won’t work if the people who vote aren’t educated and rational.

Free government is a check on the insidious power of the wealthy, well-born, and powerful. JA argued that there can be no “free government” without a democratic branch, specifically, one selected through elections. While elections provide the means of democracy, Adams argued that there must be checks and balances on the masses. The Presidents Adams concurred with one newspaper that noted, “Elections are brothels.” The “people” are subject to manipulation, dissemination, artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, superstition, glitter, flattery, quackery, and bribery. Well-resourced politicians, whose primary interest is self-aggrandizement, will lead masses astray and into decisions that are contrary to both the popular good and the principles of free government.

The Adamses saw such abuses in Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, and Andrew Jackson—all of whom cultivated personality cults, promoted themselves through images and slogans, and made tools of other people to put themselves forward. John Adams, in contrast, wrote a letter to a political ally describing the two of them as having “an ugly modesty about us…we have taken pains to conceal our names, we have delighted in the shade, we have made few friends, (turned others into) no tools…” He was, of course, overstating his own modesty a bit. But there is much truth to what he said, as no personality cult ever grew up around either JA or JQA. Their independent thinking and constant intellectual growth prevented such adulation.

The Adamses reveal in both their letters and their diaries that they were as critical on themselves as they were on others. This genuine humility and self-examination mingled with their pride and stubbornness, and any picture of them that does not include this paradox is deceptive.

John Adams was engaged in developing and perfecting the idea of a “constitution.” He was the primary author of the constitution of the state of Massachusetts, and the U.S. constitution was modeled after that and much influenced by Adams’s writings, even though he was serving as a diplomat in Europe during the Constitutional Convention. He was particularly keen to develop a difference between the functions of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The House of Representatives would represent the voice of the people, elected by people who knew the candidates locally. The Senate, on the other hand, would act as a check on the House, made up of wise, successful, noble, and able people. The Senate would hold in check the tendency of people to be tricked by the powerful and wealthy. In a world of passion, anger, competition, individualism run amok, liberty turned to licentiousness, and fragmentation, the Senate would make sure the adults remained in charge. (pg. 111)

Adams worried about state and federal elections, where candidates would not be personally known by the voters, and thus more subject to intrigue and deception. “Candidates…invent public identities in order to acquire attention and impress voters.” (pg. 113)

Both Adamses saw how Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson used “democracy” to hide the fact that they were powerful, wealthy slaveholders, who used the democratic masses to maintain the status quo of southern electoral advantage (the enslaved were counted 3/5 in the census, increasing the number of seats in the House the south had…and the number of electoral votes—yet the enslaved could not vote, making the votes of plantation owners and other whites worth much more than northern votes.)

Isenberg and Burstein use the writings of the Adamses to point out that those who developed a “cult of personality” (Franklin, Jefferson, Washington, Jackson) take advantage of people’s tendency to live vicariously through the lives of the rich and famous. If tragedy befalls a celebrity, people will feel ten times worse about it than a tragedy that befalls an ordinary person. (pg. 140)

There is an interesting comparison of Washington and the Adamses at the end of the book. While the Adamses both respected and appreciated Washington, (he was never the subject of an attack from them), Isenberg and Burstein see the cult of personality reaching its apex in those days with Washington. Most people, then and now, know very little of Washington’s thinking, his political philosophy, his intelligence, or his substantial decisions. They know him instead by image: silent, above the fray, honest, popular with the people, calm… Both Jefferson and Jackson sought to model themselves by image. The critique of Jefferson, Jackson, and Franklin is for another book, another essay. But the Adamses rejection of image making for themselves is noteworthy.

This book is a critical read today for helping us understand the struggles of democracy. Perhaps democracy is dying because we have been unable to counter its excesses. There is a cycle, the authors contend, that whips back and forth between the injustice of the oligarchy and the rage of the masses. Such struggle is with us all the time. What we see today in the rage stoked by demagogues is nothing new. The news keeps us worked up daily over the issues of democracy and political dysfunction. A good history, such as Isenberg and Burstein have written, gives us some clarity and a glimpse of the path forward. It is very good that the Presidents Adams have left us such a wealth of wisdom in their diaries and letters. A little more time with them and a little less time watching and reading the news would make us all a little more sane.

Jenkins, Jerry, Dead Sea Rising (novel)

Jenkins tells the tale of three stories, but he never connects them in this novel. (I read that he wrote a sequel that connects at least two of them.) But the fact that they were never connected in this book gives the reader a feeling of being cheated in this book.

The first story he tells is of a modern archaeologist (Nicole) who is trying to get a permit to dig in Saudi Arabia. While waiting, her mother gets attacked and ends up in the hospital with life-threatening injuries. The author insinuates that this has something to do with someone evil from the archaeology community, and the attack is a warning to “stay away.” The attack on Nicole’s mother is investigated by a New York cop who suspects the daughter and husband in the attack. The thinking and actions of the cop are totally unrealistic, to the point of being irritating.

The second story concerns Nicole’s father, his time in the Marines in Viet Nam, and a woman he fell in love with there, before being shipped back to the states with part of his hand blown off. The story just dangles at the end of the novel.

The third story takes place in roughly 2000 B.C. in ancient Ur, and is centered around the biblical Abraham’s father (a real jerk) and Abraham’s birth. It is a dark and unsettling story, that may have more truth to it than the modern stories Jenkins tries to tell, although it is entirely speculative without any evidence.

Throughout the novel, Jenkins subtly pushes his misguided theories about biblical prophecy and lauds the thinking and practices of the Christian sect of Messianic Jews.

I didn’t realize until later that Jenkins is also the author of the Left Behind series. This novel, Dead Sea Rising suffers from judgmental theology, shoddy biblical scholarship, artificial characters, disrespect for the reader… The suspense was good… but it went nowhere.

The author also indicates that Nicole is being kept from finding evidence about Abraham that would change the course of Jewish-Muslim history. This “tease” shows a gross neglect of Arabic history and a naivete of enmity and tribalism, something that cannot be undone simply by the discovery of an artifact.

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of Avonlea (novel #2 in Anne of Green Gables series)

In this sequel to Anne of Green Gables, we see Anne taking up teaching responsibilities at the local grade school, even though she is only about 16. In this novel, Anne’s spirit pervades: optimistic, imaginative, strong-willed, courageous. She is attracted to eccentric people, and her engagement with them is usually life-transforming—for them.

Montgomery reprises many of her themes and scenarios from book one in the series. Instead of Anne being out of control, we are introduced to Davy, an orphan who outdoes even Anne in his lack of discipline and high-spiritedness. We see the ongoing saga of Anne and her love-hate relationship with Gilbert Blythe. She begins to see the advantages of friendship with him, but spurns his romantic overtures.

Anne is persistent and flexible in this novel. While holding to her high ideals, she is forced to find ways to deal with the practical problems facing her, especially in teaching and working with students.

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of Green Gables (novel)

Catalogued as a “children’s” novel, this delightful read (for any age reader) traces the adventures of Anne Shirley, an 11-year-old orphan, who is adopted by an old bachelor, Matthew Cuthbert, and his never-married sister, Marilla. They thought they were getting a boy to help out around the farm.  But her being a girl was the least of their adjustments.  They had never imagined such a fiery, imaginative, and loquacious child existed.  

Lucy Montgomery, an interesting character in her own right, published this novel in 1908.  It likely gave her an imaginative respite from her own turbulent life.  The character of Anne is still providing a needed refreshment from all that weighs us down.  The laugh-out-loud speeches that Anne gives, and the predicaments she causes, leave the reader thinking, “I needed that!”

Montgomery wrote a series of books about Anne, as she grows up.  But it is clear that her first novel about her is the best.

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of the Island (novel #3 in Anne of Green Gables series)

In this third novel about Anne Shirley, we see her headed off to college, encountering more eccentric character (such as her housemate Phillipa) and meeting the man of her dreams (Roy Gardner.) Gilbert Blythe, her childhood friend, has proposed to her, but she declines, and their relationship becomes very distant after that. He dates another girl, whom everyone expects will become his wife. Meanwhile, everyone also expects Anne and Roy to get married: they seem the perfect couple. But as the novel ends, Roy proposes, Anne’s answer surprises, and we are set up for novel #4 in the series.

Montgomery, Lucy, Anne of Windy Poplars (novel #4 in Anne of Green Gables series)

This fourth novel is less a story and more a series of letters and narrative adventures. Anne Shirley, with her college degree in hand, is now a principle at a school, with a staff of two other teachers working with her. She is opposed by the Pringle family, an extended family in the local area. They wanted someone else to get Anne’s job. It looks like they will drive her away after just one semester, even though she planned to keep the job for three years, the time it will take her fiancé Gilbert to finish his education to become a doctor.

As in the other novels, Anne is attracted to a number of eccentric characters, whose lives are changed because of Anne’s involvement with them.

Less a story, and more a collection of anecdotes, many of them variations on previous anecdotes in the Anne series, this book lacks the quality and depth of Anne of Green Gables. But it keeps us connected with characters we love. It is a good book to take to bed at night, to cleanse the spirit before going to sleep.

Smith, Beverly, A Land No Map Can Find (novel)

Libby is an imaginative, fearless, big-hearted six-year-old; and she can’t get enough of her parents and her little sister. She even loves her big sister, despite the aggravations the two of them cause each other.

But by the middle of the novel, Dr. Holt (Libby) is estranged from her family, friendless, lonely, suffering panic attacks, and clueless as to where to turn or how to proceed with her life. Wherever she needs to “go” in order to recover some semblance of her better angels is a “land no map can find.” What then can give her hope and direction? Beverly Smith’s novel gives us hints.

The novel has two parts: Libby as a child and Libby as an adult. Her family suffers several catastrophes in Libby’s childhood that sweep away her bright world. She copes with these difficulties in the ways children do: with illusions of her own power, imagination, curious physical ailments, and compensatory achievements. The world of math steadies and assures her when everything else is unreliable and harmful. (Beverly Smith knows children: their mannerisms and their psychology. She writes about children in the same way that Mary Cassatt paints them: with uncanny and appreciative perception.)

As Libby’s story moves into her adulthood, she finds herself imprisoned by the tragedies of her childhood. But her psyche rebels, especially through a series of panic attacks. There is no map for escape, however, only a courageous exploration into her own overgrown past and an opportunity to carve out a new path to find elements of her true self that can be resurrected.

Smith takes us into the dark, but doesn’t leave us there. This is a novel is full of truths we all share. It is also a novel of hope, the kind that can infuse its readers.

Beverly Smith is a colleague in my writers’ group, and a friend. She is one of our best writers, and I recommend this novel with no hesitation. Of course, as mutual critics of each other’s work, she and I enjoy challenging and pushing each other, and even in this published work, there are places I want to start an argument with her. But ultimately, this is a wonderful read: full of poetic prose, creepy and sad in all the right places, and culminating in hope. Read it!

Weir, Andy, Project Hail Mary (science fiction)

Middle School science teacher, Ryland Grace, wakes up in a spaceship, not knowing how he got there, not knowing why he’s there, and at first, not even able to recall his own name. He discovers that his two fellow astronauts are dead. He is alone. As the novel moves on, he slowly begins to recollect the pieces of the story that led up to his predicament.

One of the things he remembers is that the sun is rapidly dying, a scenario that will kill nearly all life on earth within 30 years. He then remembers why its dying: it is infected with a parasite, a living organism called “astrophage.” He deduces that he is on the spaceship to solve the problem.

Thus, the reader learns that Grace is on a spaceship with a well-equipped lab, on a mission to save the earth. It is a journey that will take him out of the solar system and into discovery of other life forms in the universe. He will encounter several life-threatening disasters, which means that if he dies, so does everyone else on earth.

I’m not informed enough to know whether the science in this novel is credible, but I enjoyed the story thoroughly: its flawed but likeable characters, its suspense, its plot, its theme, its twists and turns… The story includes themes of persistence, learning how to use problems to solve problems, the power of rational thinking, and ethics. The novel is also full of good humor.

I listened to it on Audible, and the great performance by Ray Porter enhanced my enjoyment of the book.

Widmer, Ted, Martin Van Buren (presidential biography)

I read Widmer’s short and well written book in conjunction with a visit to Lindenwald, Van Buren’s retirement home after he left the presidency.

While Van Buren’s presidency was less impactful than his predecessor’s (Andrew Jackson), his work and creativity as a politician was more significant than anyone else’s in American history. As an individual, he wrestled with the primal conundrum of every politician: do I do the right thing… or do I do what I have to do to win the next election? In his career, Van Buren went back and forth on that question. His personal life comprised a good story: born poor, to Dutch farmers south of Albany, New York, Van Buren had to learn English as his second language. He scraped and scratched his way into law, then into politics. His wife died before he made it to the White House, and Van Buren never remarried. His children were a significant part of his life and prominent around Lindenwald (outside Kinderhook, south of Albany) in his retirement.

Van Buren was a political engineer. Finding a broken system, especially dysfunctional in the aftermath of the 1824 presidential election, he (theoretically) sought to transform political parties from personality cults into disciplined organizations built around issues and compromise. He also was the first to market the party to the masses, engineering Andrew Jackson’s landslide election in 1828. Ironically, Andrew Jackson was himself the object of a personality cult. As a reward, Van Buren became Jackson’s Secretary of State, and then his vice president (during Jackson’s second term.) He was the founder of the modern Democratic Party. The system Van Buren promoted was perfected during his time in New York State politics, in Albany.

Side point: in order to understand all the national presidential elections of the 1800s, it is important to learn about inter-partay fighting in New York State, on both the Democratic side and the Republican side. Widmer’s work gives us some insight into that.

Van Buren won election to the presidency in 1836. Put in historical context, is administration occurred at a time when divisions were hardening between the north and south over slavery, and an economic depression unexpectedly hit the country within months after Van Buren took office. He lost his re-election bid in 1840 in one of America’s most raucous elections ever. While he ran again in 1844, he lost the nomination because of his principled stand on Texas and slavery. He ran as an anti-slavery candidate in 1848, on the Free Soil Party ticket, and his presence in the race tipped the election to the Whig party.

While considered to be one of our more obscure presidents, Van Buren is one of those hidden gems that will enlighten and evoke much thought and insight for anyone wanting to take the time to get to know him better.

Books Read in June-July 2022

Adams, Lyssa Kay, The Bromance Book Club: Bromance Book Club #1 (romance novel)

Berry, Wendell, That Distant Land (short fiction, Kentucky, rural community)

Hanna, Rachel, Sweet Tea B&B (romance novel)

Hanna, Rachel, Sweet Tea Sunrise (romance novel)

Jen, Gish, Thank You Mr. Nixon:  Stories (short fiction, Chinese, immigrants to U.S.)

Nickless, Barbara, Blood on the Tracks (murder mystery, psychological mystery) (Sydney Parnell #1)

Pafford, John, M., The Accidental President:  Chester A. Arthur (biography, history)

Rooney, Sally, Beautiful World, Where Are You? (novel)


Adams, Lyssa Kay, The Bromance Book Club: Bromance Book Club #1 (romance novel)

I accidentally read two romance novels earlier this month (see my review of Sweet Tea B & B.)  They were pleasant enough, but I was distracted by the poor writing, the author’s inattention to craft, and sloppy editing.  It made me grouchy.  And so my daughter suggested I try one more:  The Bromance Book Club.  And since I always do what my daughters tell me, I read it.

The craft was much better.  But it still didn’t live up to the standard of a good literary novel.  Craft-wise, the most difficult problem Adams has is the constant shifting of POV (Point of View.)  Sometimes you are getting the inner thoughts of two different characters in the same paragraph. This wobbling back and forth of POV distracts and slows down the reader, as we keep trying to figure out who is thinking and feeling what.  Adams would have been better off had she waited to shift POV at the beginning of each new chapter.

Her story was clever:  a professional baseball team advising one of their players who had just “blown” it with his wife.  His teammates recommend that he read romance novels, particularly from the 18th century, in order to win his wife back.  The story moves ahead with a comedy of errors.

There are steamy sex scenes in the Bromance Book Club.   Writing graphic sex is a challenge for a good writer.  How do you craft them without imitating pornographic letters to the editor published in Hustler magazine?  Adams didn’t clear the hurdle.  It’s not the sex, nor the graphic physical descriptions that bothered me, it was the lack of craft, a failure to find a fresh writing approach.  Sometimes less is more.

The other problem I had with the novel was the obsession with rippling muscles, etc.  It seems that Adams has written off about 99% of the males on the planet as unworthy of a woman’s attention.  But, men have been doing that with women for so long, that I guess turn about is fair play.  But to get in this novel, only studs and hunks and the filthy rich need apply.  I happen to think that romance is possible for everyone.  But I’m not sure this author does.

Having said that, I did enjoy the novel, and if my daughter can convince me that this author addresses some of my “craft” concerns in her subsequent work, I may read another one.

Berry, Wendell, That Distant Land (short fiction, Kentucky, rural community)

Wendall Berry is a farmer, a poet, a critic, a storyteller, and a Kentuckian. His novels and short stories usually find their setting in Port William, a fictional town about 50 miles from Louisville. His characters span several generations, starting in the late 1800s. He describes how the changes in technology, culture, and world events change lives in Port William. 

This particular book is an anthology of stories that appear elsewhere in his writings. He tells them in chronological order, and you find yourself wanting to read about the same characters as they are covered in more depth in his other writings. His descriptions of nature, secret feelings and thoughts, and earthy observations about the human body are exquisite.

If you haven’t ever read a Wendall Berry short story, don’t wait. This book is a great starting point.

Hanna, Rachel, Sweet Tea Sunrise (romance novel)

I read the first book in this series and was glad to get to the end of it, not caring much for the writing or the thinness of the characters. It was nice bedtime reading to clear my mind though, and when the author ended Sweet Tea B&B by hanging the reader off a cliff, I forked out another $4 to read book two to see what happened.

The main character, Mia, keeps discovering new relatives through a DNA test she took. As I finished book two, since there was no cliffhanger, I was released from buying volume 3. The men in her stories are all hunks who were immature when they were young and suddenly become sensitive and brilliant when they are in their 30s. The girls and women are all victims, but fall for these gorgeous hunks who once broke their hearts. There is little depth of character. Suspense ends predictably. Everything moves toward a happily ever after ending with little change in character or attitude or insight that the reader can see. The women are the main characters, and the stories are mostly told through their point of view. All the women are rude and rejecting of the men in the story, then they decide not to be so stubborn (because the men are hunks, and they are soooo nice!) 

The author seems like a nice person, but I’m looking for a better story.

Hanna, Rachel, Sweet Tea B&B (romance novel)

This is a quick, quick read… something I read before going to bed to clear my mind. It is not well written (several typos and editing mistakes) and the characters are too much alike. All the men were jerks in their youth and all the women have similar stories about suffering from those jerks. The men all come back years later and apologize, and the women all give in, fall madly in love with them, and fall into torrid romances. Oh… the men are all hunks. 

Meanwhile, the dialogue lacks originality and quickly becomes tedious. The south is good and the north is bad. The rural town is good and the city is bad. 

The setting is a southern B & B owned by a woman whose mother has died. Through DNA testing, she discovers she has a sister, from the north. The sister comes with a bratty daughter. Of course, once they get exposed to the south, they are transformed.

Other than that, I enjoyed the book and wanted to keep reading it. 

I was glad to complete it, but it ended with a suspense I wanted to have resolved. Damn it. So I spent another $4 to get the sequel on my Kindle and read it too. See my review of “Sweet Tea Sunrise” to continue. 

Jen, Gish, Thank You Mr. Nixon:  Stories (short fiction, Chinese, immigrants to U.S.)

This collection of short stories centers most around family relationships found in Chinese who have immigrated to the United States. Some of the same characters weave in and out of the several stories. As the spouse of a Chinese immigrant, it seems that there is much truth to Jen’s story telling.

Jen is decidedly unimpressed with the ethical standards of the ruling Communist party in China, although the troubles individuals face at the hand of that government are more a sub theme rather than a main theme of her stories. She is has a good ear and eye for the stress that immigrants have as they leave one culture and take up residence in another. She also has a sharp insight into the generational stress experienced by immigrant families. 

Her first story (Thank You, Mr. Nixon) provides is a misleading title for the anthology as a whole. It is a delightful story of a 10 year old girl in Hangzhou who sees President and Mrs. Nixon on their visit to that city. She reflects on how Mrs. Nixon in particular influenced her.

The story then shifts mostly to the United States and traces the struggles and choices of both first and second generation immigrants. 

Jen is an excellent writer and you find yourself getting involved with her characters. The end of each story leaves you wanting more.

Nickless, Barbara, Blood on the Tracks (murder mystery, psychological mystery) Sidney Rose Parnell # 1

The protagonist of Barbara Nickless’s debut novel is Sydney Parnell, a twenty-something young woman who works as a railroad cop (outside Denver) while trying to finish her college education. Sydney is also still in the reserves, having served as a Marine in the Iraq war. She worked morgue duty in the war, picking up and processing the bodies and remains of her fellow soldiers. The dead she has handled visit and haunt her, even back in the states.

At the beginning of the novel, Sydney’s friend Elsie, (almost like a sister) is murdered and her body mutilated. It seems like an open and shut case: all signs point to another ex-Marine as the perpetrator, someone Sydney met in Iraq. He protests to Sydney that he is innocent, and she decides to do some sleuthing.

Like a good mystery, the novel leads you this way and that before a final twist in its surprise ending. Along the way we learn about railroads, the culture of those who hop the trains, ritual sacrifices of Nazi white supremacists, moral struggles of those who have committed war crimes, and hobo subculture. We also get some shoot ’em up scenes, a budding romance, a fierce winter snowstorm, and a sex scene between two badly injured cops.

All this may seem a little much, but it’s not: it works. The novel moves along, maintains suspense, stays within the lanes of credibility, and satisfies.

All through the story we see Sydney wrestle with her demons and struggle to square her conscience with the realities of her life… and the actions of those closest to her. She is an imperfect, likeable, and sympathetic protagonist.

The novel brings the reader into intersecting worlds of violence: war, racism, domestic violence, nature, suicide… The protagonist tries to find a way to move on with her life in such a world. Her plans for moving on waver, muddy, and yield to whatever crisis or opportunity land in her way. Her hope lies mostly in whatever accidents and luck come to her. In the end, even though Sydney is still trying to find a better way through all the violence, the novel itself wraps up by paying homage to the myth of redemptive violence: do unto others before they do unto you, the only way to survive violence is with violence.

This is book one of the Sydney Parnell series. I liked Nickless’s writing skill enough to give book 2 a try soon. I saw just enough of Sydney to think she may be able to find a way around the myth of redemptive violence in the future.

Pafford, John, M., The Accidental President:  Chester A. Arthur (biography, history)

I’ve read several books on our 21st president, and this is the one I’d least recommend. Pafford takes a sympathetic approach to Arthur, but his information is thin and more than half the book is more about Arthur’s times rather than Arthur himself. In fact, Pafford seems more interested in giving a general history of the United States from the time of the Civil War to Theodore Roosevelt than in telling us about Arthur.

Granted that original sources about Arthur are slim, given that he ordered all his private and official papers burned a few days before his death. But there are many documents that survive that are never mentioned by Pafford, such as the letters sent to him by Julia Sand (a woman in New York who wrote to him about his reputation for corruption and urged him to rise above that reputation as president.) There are also many newspaper articles Pafford could have gleaned in his work, specific to Arthur and his presidency.

For me personally, Pafford is irritating because he gives a number of personal opinions that are condescending to women, blacks, and Chinese. He is more an apologist for how politicians in the late 1800s treated various “outsiders” than he is seeing the bigger picture of how systems wasted so much human capital. Pafford also lets his religious beliefs get in the way of his historical objectivity, as he has a concept, mentioned several times, of “biblical religion,” as though there is only one proper way (his way) to interpret scriptures. This comes up in several places as he tries to describe changes occurring in American religious history in the early 20th century. This is odd since it has nothing to do with Chester Arthur, his presidency, or even issues that were relevant to him. 

Rooney, Sally, Beautiful World, Where Are You? (novel)

Among the novels I’ve read this year, thus far, this is the one I recommend to all my literary friends. It has suspense, flawed and fascinating characters that elicit our empathy, politics, psychology, friendship, sex, unique dialogue, nature, sensuality, religion and faith, and numerous quotes I want to underline and recall.

Set in Ireland and England, just prior to the pandemic, the four protagonists are Eileen and Simon, and Alice and Felix. Eileen and Simon have known and adored each other all their lives. But their fears and unhealthy coping mechanisms are keeping them from making a commitment to each other. Of the four, Simon is the religious one, a catalyst for interesting conversations and questions among the three atheists. Simon is an even tempered, generous care-giver, but is incapable of letting anyone care for him. Eileen has been lonely all her life, and her grief frequently turns to grievance, which exacerbates her loneliness. All the way through the novel, both characters struggle against their flaws and we find ourselves rooting for them.

Alice was Eileen’s college roommate. While Eileen was timid, Alice was the “bad girl” who took risks. Throughout the novel we read email exchanges between the two of them, as they reflect intelligently on their past, their friendship, their love lives, religion, politics, family, sex, the future… We also begin to note some fault lines in their friendship and wonder where they will lead. Eileen goes on to become an editor for a little known literary magazine, and lives in near poverty. Alice, on the other hand, writes a best selling novel and becomes famous and rich beyond anything she imagined. This difference between the two friends also gives the novel an interesting dynamic. Alice has a psychotic breakdown and is hospitalized (a past event the two friends occasionally reference in their emails) and Eileen suffers from her own, less note-worthy emotional dysfunctions. This also plays into the dynamic of their relationship.

Alice meets Felix on a dating site and the two of them strike up the most unlikely relationship. He works in a warehouse and doesn’t read books. He’s also constantly broke and owing money to his friends. He’s never heard of his famous “blind date” and has no idea she’s wealthy. At their first meeting he’s not impressed and walks out. His actions and comments are the most surprising and original of the book, revealing his insecurities, rudeness, strength, insight, independence, and humor. The interaction between Felix and Alice is fascinating and suspenseful. The dialogue is brilliant. They keep coming back together, and the reader slowly finds the credibility of the relationship between the two growing. 

I find myself both impatient with the characters AND wanting to remember the things they write and said for my own benefit. Everything considered in this novel: Five stars. 

Books Read in April-May, 2022

Bishop, Bill, The Big Sort:  Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart (politics, sociology, religion)

Brammer, Billy Lee, The Gay Place (political novel)

Fagan, Kate, All the Colors Came Out:  A Father, A Daughter, and a Lifetime of Lessons (memoir, basketball, ALS)

Keller, Timothy J. and Inazu, John D., editors, Uncommon Ground:  Living Faithfully in a World of Difference (Christian living, political conflict, theological conflict)

Koehler, Jeff, La Paella:  Deliciously Authentic Rice Dishes from Spain’s Mediterranean Coast, (cookbook) 

Owens, Virginia Stem, Wind River Winter

Bishop, Bill, The Big Sort:  Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart (politics, sociology, religion)

Bishop is a journalist who partnered with sociologist Robert Cushing to understand the grassroots contributions to America’s political polarization.  The gist of his discovery is that Americans are using their mobility to cluster in communities and neighborhoods of like-minded voters.  Red areas are getting redder because people are moving out of blue areas to be more comfortable with their neighbors.  People move into blue areas for the same reason.

This same phenomenon is visible in religion, where people increasingly feel more comfortable in churches where people think and vote like themselves.  Mainline denominations, with a big tent mindset, are fast losing ground to homogenous denominations and non-denominational congregations.  Bishop bemoans the growing narrowmindedness this causes, and the paralysis of national politics, but offers no solutions.

While the book left me feeling bleak, I found the information very helpful and it has given me much to ponder as I think about my own decades as a pastor in a mainline denomination, one that is currently experiencing a walk-out over an intolerance of diversity, particularly around LGBTQ+ issues.

Brammer, Billy Lee, The Gay Place (political novel)

The novel is centered around three politicians (a state representative, a U.S. senator, and a governor’s speech writer) who are getting bored with politics, friends, and marriage.  Their search for “the gay place” has a grim and frantic character to it.  At times the novel is dark and depressing.  What kept me hooked, however, was the character that linked all these other politicians:  Governor Arthur Fenstemaker, a mesmerizing master politician, full of ambition, biblical quotes, and political savvy.  Fenstemaker, modeled on Lyndon Johnson (for whom the author once worked) is simultaneously charming, deceptive, all knowing, and entirely mortal.  I wish the author would have given us more of him. Fenstemaker’s wife is known as “Sweet Mama,” and bears a remarkable resemblance to Lady Bird Johnson.

Published in 1961, the novel has been called one of America’s greatest political novels, so far not a terribly high bar to reach.  Its author modeled several of the politicians on his own life, a frustrated quest for love and power.  It was Brammer’s only novel.  After its publication, he drifted in his professional and private life and eventually died of a drug overdose in 1978.  

Originally 3 novels, the publisher insisted it be published as one book.  It was appreciated by critics more than readers.  I agree with the early critics that the book will stick around and likely be a classic, perhaps 100 years after its publication. It includes descriptions of actions, words, and feelings of various politicians that add up and give us remarkable psychological and political insight. I wish we could have heard more from Brammer, and his hero, Arthur Fenstemaker. 

Fagan, Kate, All the Colors Came Out:  A Father, A Daughter, and a Lifetime of Lessons (memoir, basketball, ALS)

The central character of this memoir is Chris Fagan:  his love of basketball, his relationship with his daughter Kate, and his long and losing struggle with ALS.  Fagan played college basketball, then professional basketball in Europe, passed his love of the sport on to his daughter Kate, who played high school and college basketball herself, and then went on to become a writer and on on-air personality on ESPN.  

Three themes mingle powerfully throughout this memoir:  the father-daughter’s shared love of basketball and many hours playing one on one together, the father’s battle with ALS and how Kate, her mother, and her sister all got drawn in to help as he grew increasingly dependent on others, and reflections on the ups and down of the father-daughter relationship and what this particular father and daughter each meant to the other.

Chris died in late 2019, just months before COVID shut everything down.  His daughter’s description of his struggle with ALS is graphic and powerful.  She is brutally honest about the effects of the disease on the body and the ways it upends the life of everyone in the family.  It is hard to read, but very important for those of us out of that loop to understand.

The memoir hones in on the times father/daughter spent playing basketball together, and his influence on her, both to give her athletic skills and life skills in that process.  It is touching.  Kate Fagen shows us her own growth process through the story she tells, and she honors her father in the process.

Keller, Timothy J. and Inazu, John D., editors, Uncommon Ground:  Living Faithfully in a World of Difference (Christian living, political conflict, theological conflict)

Ten different authors contributed essays to this book, each one reflecting on the conflicts they encountered with more secular associates and religious people who held ideas they considered “unjust” or “unbiblical.”  

I most appreciated the tone of the writing:  gracious and thoughtful.  Each contributor wrote from a particular standpoint, one a songwriter, one an artist, one a lawyer, one a pastor, one a teacher, etc.  Each was interested in how to maintain creativity and relationship in the midst of conflicts that normally destroy relationships.  The conflicts were almost entirely over issues of race and human sexuality.  The authors tended to be appalled at racism but judgmental about what they considered sexual lifestyle choices.  

And for me, this was the primary problem of the book:  the sense of religious certainty each author assumed for their own position on the ethics of race and sexuality.  While remaining gracious in tone, the authors each assumed a single “Biblical truth” on racial and sexual issues.  Regarding their certainty, I graciously demur. Biblical teachings and pronunciations regarding racial and sexual issues are incredibly complex.  Those ancient teachings are rooted in cultural understandings and applications not at all equivalent to our own times, thus leaving their thoughtless wholesaling of those “truths” into our own lives a grievous violation of the fundamental teachings of Jesus.  

Religious “certainty” is an insidious virus that is at the root of war, racism, sexism, and nearly every inhumane thing one person can do to another.  If the book wanted to address our growing polarization in both the church and in the wider society, it needed to recognize and address the issues certainty, condescension, and pride that is an occupational hazard for we religious persons. This said, however, the book was a helpful reminder to me, and a teacher, showing me how to treat others out of God’s love for all rather than my impatience with some.

Koehler, Jeff, La Paella:  Deliciously Authentic Rice Dishes from Spain’s Mediterranean Coast, (cookbook) 

This is the first cookbook I read the entire way through.  I was unfamiliar with paella until my wife and I went to a restaurant in Tampa and noticed the dish being brought to the table next to us.  We went back to the same restaurant a couple nights later and ordered it for ourselves.  I decided quickly to try fixing it on my own when I got back to the Midwest.  

Not wanting to do it halfway, I announced to my congregation that we were going to have a “paella” night.  No one there had ever fixed it (nor had I at that point.)  I got hold of this cookbook from a friend, who also loaned me her paella pans.  I read the book from cover to cover and watched several YouTube videos.  On the night of the dinner, 15 people showed up to help me cook, and we fixed four different recipes from the book, without a trial run beforehand.

The crowd of 30 who showed up to eat finished everything.  

The paella has the following necessities:

1.  A paella pan:  a shallow, steel pan, up to 26 inches in diameter.

2.  El sofrito: a slow, aromatic sauté of vegetables.  Tomatoes and fresh peppers are almost always included.  The sofrito can also include artichoke hearts, green beans, eggplant, peas, etc.

3.  La picada:  a mashed paste of toasted almonds, fresh parsley leaves, and garlic cloves, sometimes people add rabbit liver.  La picada is added near the end of cooking the sofrito.

4.  Saffron and smoked paprika:  added at the end of the cooking the sofrito.

5.  Featured meats and fish:  added at various times, depending on the recipe.  These can include snails, clams, mussels, head on shrimp, rabbit, chicken, pork, cuttlefish, etc.

6.  The liquid:  fish stock, vegetable stock, chicken stock, or water.

7.  Rice:  this is the most important ingredient.  It should be short or medium grain, preferably from Spain.  You can buy this rice at specialty stores or online. When the water is boiling in the paella pan, with the seasoned sofrito, add the rice, poke it around to distribute it evenly, then do not stir for the next 18 minutes:  10 minutes on high flame and 8 on low.  The rice will carmelize on the bottom of the pan:  the best part. 

Owens, Virginia Stem, Wind River Winter

This is a 35 year old memoir by a prolific writer, known for her powers of observation and turn of phrase.  Without betraying too many personal factoids, Owens tells us that she (a teacher) and her husband (a pastor) have taken a six month sabbatical to Wyoming to learn how to die.  Both are about 40 and have reached the end of the line, both for their careers, as well as for other aspects of their activity and identity.  Their cabin is a little east of the Tetons.  

Starting in September and going through March, we see the approach of winter, its deepening, and its yielding to the renewal of the earth in springtime.  The winter and what it does to nature all around them becomes a metaphor and a teacher of death.  As they attend a local church through this winter, we get an interesting juxtaposition of religion with real issues of life and death.  Letters and messages from home, their changing relationships with their independent, young adult children, and their physical reactions to the winter all come into play in this memoir.

Owens is a marvelous writer, with uncanny observations and original twists of phrase, unafraid to plunge into mystery and confusion and hold up gems of wisdom.  It is not an easy read, but a valuable and life-giving one.

Books Read in February-March, 2022

Arias, Mortimer, Announcing the Reign of God:  Evangelism and the Subversive Memory of Jesus (theology, Kingdom of God, evangelism, Christology)

Coleman, Robert E., The Master Plan of Evangelism (religious conquest of the world)

Cullen, Art, Storm Lake:  A Chronicle of Change, Resilience, and Hope from a Heartland Newspaper.  (memoir, environment, small town rural America, agriculture)

Dickens, Charles, David Copperfield (novel)

Hunter, George C. III, Radical Outreach:  The Recovery of Apostolic Ministry and Evangelism  (church growth, religious conversion, complaints about Christians and institutional church, culture and religion)

Jones, E. Stanley, The Christ of the Indian Road  (memoir, Christian mission, Christology, India)

Larson, Kate Clifford, Walk With Me:  A Biography of Fanny Lou Hamer  (biography)

Messud, Claire, The Woman Upstairs (novel)

Moriarty, Liane, Apples Never Fall (novel)

Pinder-Amaker, Stephanie, and Wadsworth, Lauren, Did That Just Happen?!: Beyond “Diversity”–Creating Sustainable and Inclusive Organizations (cultural diversity, bigotry, rising identities)

Probulos, I.M., Jesus Returns July 13: Times Square New York (satire)

Stevenson, Robert Louis, Treasure Island (classic novel)

Strout, Elizabeth, My Name Is Lucy Barton (novel)

Arias, Mortimer, Announcing the Reign of God:  Evangelism and the Subversive Memory of Jesus (theology, Kingdom of God, evangelism, Christology)

Mortimer Arias, born in 1924, was the bishop of the Evangelical Methodist Church of Bolivia from 1969-1976.  Afterward he taught missions and evangelism at Perkins, Iliff, and Claremont.  He also taught at the Latin America seminary in Costa Rica.  His book, Announcing the Reign of God:  Evangelism and the Subversive Memory of Jesus was written in 1984, during a period of extreme violence in Latin America.  That part of the world was home of the proxy wars between the United States and the Soviet Union.  Ronald Reagan was pouring arms and mercenaries into Latin America to fight both communist and democratic movements.  Repressive governments in El Salvador and Guatemala were systematically killing their own citizens, including Christian leaders who advocated for the poor.  Bishop Oscar Romero of El Salvador was assassinated by government agents as he stood at the altar leading worship.  Liberation theology focused on the power of Jesus for bringing justice and jubilee to the masses.  Both the Roman Catholic Church and American Evangelical movements used the repressive regimes in Latin America to get an edge on in their own ecclesiastical political wars.  The Reagan administration used the religious right to support its political aims in overthrowing the Sandinista government of Nicaragua.  

 Arias draws on the spiritual and intellectual giants of Latin America to compile his book.  We see the influence of Jon Sobrino and Gustavo Gutierrez all through Arias’s writing.  We also see the influence of Jim Wallis, Jurgen Moltmann, Leslie Newbigin, and E. Stanley Jones. 

In his introduction, Arias identifies the trouble for “modern evangelism.”  It faces a crisis of credibility, motivation, definition, and method.  His aim is to identify an evangelistic endeavor that is biblical, evangelical, holistic, humanizing, conscientizing, liberating, contextual, engaged, incarnational, and conflictive.  His book succeeds with the ambition goal.

…but not without taking the reader through the thick weeds of German and American theological tomes.  His efforts to engage the breadth of European and North American religious scholars makes Announcing the Reign almost unreadable for the average Christian.  It would be a more powerful book if 60% of it were in footnotes.  Having noted that, I’ll pick out the things Arias wrote that were (and remain) most powerful for Christians who want to share Christ with others.

The key premise of the book is that THE key focus of Jesus was in proclaiming the Kingdom of God.  Jesus’ good news was that the Kingdom was here, near, and distant… simultaneously.  It brought and was bringing justice, liberation, abundant life, healing, joy, goodness, forgiveness, and rebirth.  Both individuals and systems were being upended and reformed by it.  

Of course it was advancing into our lives and world with great difficulty and conflict because too many people were enjoying the privileges of the current order of things.  Systems were firmly in place to protect the privileged. 

The modern church, as a steward of Jesus’ message, was failing.  The message of the biblical kingdom has been reduced in modern times to institutional religion, the afterlife, the individualistic saving of souls by prescription, or mere political causes and reforms.  Arias calls upon the reader to recover the core message of Jesus:  the joy and goodness of the Kingdom of God. “Evangelism,” rooted in the Greek word for “announcement of something good and joyful” should have the kingdom pronouncements of Jesus as its essence. 

Arias points out that the Kingdom in the gospels involved teaching, challenge, signs of new life, social upheaval, and demonstrations of power over entrenched diseases and injustices.  With Jesus, the good news is holistic, the “Kingdom” is all encompassing. The “Kingdom” is mentioned 122 times in the synoptic gospels, 99 times on the lips of Jesus. (pg. 8)

Arias points out that the Kingdom of God has numerous qualities and characteristics, often lacking in evangelistic work in churches today.  It is marked by grace, not condescension or condemnation.  The proclamation of the Kingdom (as Jesus presented it) has the power to stop people in their tracks and put them on a different course of living.  It initiates change in a person’s story by starting with the liberating act of forgiveness, addressing what is often hidden guilt and shame in each person, thus freeing the individual to discover new powers and gifts hidden by God in their lives.  Biblical evangelism, centered on proclaiming the “kingdom” triggers new life in individuals and communities and opens communities to people previously excluded.  

In chapter 3, “The Imminence of the Kingdom,” Arias explores many of the parables and sayings of Jesus in the gospels.  His reliance on academic scholars for their conventional understandings of these parables is the weakest part of the book.  The power of scripture, especially the parables, is watered down and set beyond the reach of the average Christian.  I wish Arias would have done exegesis himself on the parables of Jesus (the core of his teachings about the “kingdom” and given us some fire rather than so much scholastic dust.   

Arias introduces us to a distinction between the prophetic scriptures and apocalyptic scriptures. While disturbed by his simplistic and restricted understanding of apocalyptic literature, I fully agree with the main point he was making:  prophetic literature presents us with a relational God who calls upon us to make a choice.  This is in contrast to a God who has already decided the fate of the world and leaves the preacher with nothing to do but announce catastrophe.  (chapter 3)

In chapter 4, Arias addresses some of the problems with “kingdom language.”  He acknowledges the patriarchic, triumphalist leanings of the word “kingdom.”  In this rather eclectic chapter, he then goes on to show how the Kingdom of God will be opposed by the entrenched systems of this world, whose caretakers will attack the Kingdom of God and its proponents with violence.  There is abundant evidence for this, both in the Bible and in Latin America of the 1980s.  The violent attacks of the 1980s are recounted in detail in chapter 7.  Chapter four also introduces us to the choice put before people:  go with the Kingdom of God or go with its opponents, there can be no neutrality.

The crux of the whole book comes in chapter 5, “The Eclipse of the Kingdom.”  Again, in a rather dry, academic approach, Arias describes how Jesus’ message of the Kingdom gets eclipsed in the writings of Paul, who emphasizes instead the proclamation of Jesus himself.  In modern times, this has sometimes led to a Jesus cult, where people adore Jesus but ignore his message.  We have substituted swooning over Jesus for obeying his teachings.  Christians have reduced Christianity to words and labels rather than actions and sacrifice.  

In chapters 6-8, Arias confronts the reader with the need to give one’s life over totally in obedience to Jesus’ teachings and definitions of the Kingdom.  He calls upon the modern church to position itself so that the teachings of Jesus himself about the “kingdom” are no longer eclipsed. 

Two other very strong ideas that Arias presents are 1) the need to convert people inside the church, because insiders have lost a sense of Jesus’ definition of the “Kingdom” and 2) the need to have a community of joyful people who work together to proclaim and live out Jesus’ teachings. The message and the community are both essential to the work and design of Jesus.

In summary, the role of the evangelist is to center the entire evangelistic endeavor on “the Kingdom,” as taught and exhibited by Jesus. Such an approach offers this world and its peoples the only true hope there is.  Such an approach calls upon all of us to make a choice and see the life-giving, hopeful future of a life of full and total commitment. 

Coleman, Robert E., The Master Plan of Evangelism (religious conquest of the world)

I only read this book because our denomination is making pastors read it for part of their training and I wanted to see what we are requiring these days. Written in 1963 and highly touted by Billy Graham, the book purports to give a strategy for evangelism.  But its strategic concepts are vague and filled with condescension for neighbors who are not “Christian” in the sense that the author vaguely defines “Christian.” Coleman assumes a Christianity that is far more a cultural phenomenon than a matter of living by the spirit and love of Jesus.  Women are dismissed as not part of those Jesus worked with or trusted to bring the message of love to others.  The goal of evangelism for Coleman is “conquest.”  

I have trouble with books that are filled with arrogance and religious condescension.  I kept plowing through this one hoping that I still might learn something.  But the main thing I learned is that this book needs to be retired from the course readings United Methodist pastors are required to study.  

Cullen, Art, Storm Lake:  A Chronicle of Change, Resilience, and Hope from a Heartland Newspaper.  (memoir, environment, small town rural America, agriculture)

Art Cullen and his brother started a newspaper in Storm Lake, a town of 12 thousand located in northwest Iowa.  His memoir traces the demographic and political changes occurring in that part of the state and in the town of Storm Lake itself.  He writes of growing up there, meeting his wife, coming back there after living elsewhere, and the difficulties of basing one’s livelihood on a small town newspaper these days.  He also traces the loss of the family farm, the farm crisis of the 1980s, and the effect of big agri-business.  Distinguishing between horizontal agriculture and vertical agriculture, he says that the trend these days is vertical: one corporation controls everything from planting to raising livestock to processing to sales.  The result, according to Cullen, is destroying the land itself.

Most communities in northwest Iowa have reacted to the change by losing population, growing angry, in that anger supporting politicians who are demagogues, rejecting long-range environmental solutions, and scapegoating immigrants. Storm Lake, on the other hand, is an island in northwest Iowa, not only welcoming but integrating immigrants, exploring conservation, and making room for farms and businesses that don’t give in to the monopoly of big agri-business.

Cullen won a Pulitzer for his weekly columns, often focused on community and the environment.  His book was a good primer for me, a reminder of my own roots in rural northwestern Illinois, a sign of hope in what is often a sea of insanity. 

Dickens, Charles, David Copperfield (novel)

David Copperfield, published in 1849 and 1850 (first as a series and then as a book) is a novel, written in the first person, tracing the life of the narrator from birth into middle age. 

At his birth, Copperfield’s father has already died. His aunt stormed out of the house that night upon finding that her desired “niece” turned out to be a nephew. His childhood is marred by his mother’s remarriage to a wicked step-father, who eventually sends the boy off to boarding school, then to a factory to work (before there were child labor laws.) 

The novel is filled with memorable villains and benefactors, all creating great suspense as one reads along. The gentle, naive, and observant personality of the narrator is both amusing and enchanting. While there is sadness throughout the novel, it is the sadness expected in any person’s life. The story includes more than a fair share of humor and good fortune. 

Dickens slips in a considerable amount of social commentary about 19th century England, without being preachy. His progressive views about prisons, child, labor, the working class, poverty, education, women, religion, education, and government appear deftly throughout, often using gentle satire as his characters are presented.

The language can get verbose at times, and some of the references, coming from 19th century England, can be obscure. But as I kept reading, I found my footing in the story again through the fascinating characters and suspenseful situations they had to work through.

The novel is a reminder that one of the best ways for me to keep my sanity in the midst of the world going crazy these days is to find company in authors of other times who knew exactly what was happening in their own world, and found a way to guide us through with wisdom and wit.

Hunter, George C. III, Radical Outreach:  The Recovery of Apostolic Ministry and Evangelism  (church growth, religious conversion, complaints about Christians and institutional church, culture and religion)

A 2003 book, Hunter is frustrated at the institutional incompetence and the spiritual aridity of most congregations in America.  He looks back to the more effective days of the New Testament, particularly Paul’s success in Corinth, a multi-cultural city in which he sees many similarities to the American scene. Hunter also celebrates the examples of First Baptist Church in Leesburg, Florida, as a place that has overcome the anemia of most other congregations.  His favorite historical character is St. Patrick, who evangelized Ireland.  (Hunter has written another book on Celtic evangelism.)  Another hero of his is John Wesley, who eschewed the religious forms of his day and plunged directly into relating to the masses of 18th century England.  

As an outside “expert” and seminary professor, Hunter took his freedom from the trenches of pastoral ministry to position himself in a place of condescension and judgment. He is not always wrong in his observations, but his spirit is irksome.  He blames the laity for focusing on their own needs and the clergy for protecting their jobs and unnamed multitudes for fretting over political agendas and correctness.  He also has a demeaning and presumptuous way of classifying anyone who is not a Christian:  pre-Christian.  

Having gotten all that off my chest, there are some helpful observations Hunter makes.  He writes about how people change their religious perspectives and loyalties and notes that there are about 30 elements in the “chain.”  These include acts of God, texts and ideas that stick in people’s minds, compassion and stories from others, and a person’s own determination and agency.  

Hunter chides Christian for being afraid of people outside their churches, anxious about their ideas, behaviors, social status, character, or mental condition. He also chides church people and pastors for not being more creative in finding ways to relate beyond the conventional churchy activities.  

One helpful concept is that of “indigenous” religion.  While presenting the spirit of Christ, a concept that transcends most cultures, Hunter advocates that Christians engage people with more indigenous words, rituals, and activities.  European Christianity, imported to American shores hundreds of years ago, has bequeathed forms not currently indigenous to most people in the U.S.  The high point of the American church, the 1050s, has also left us with form and practices that are alien to current Americans.  The spirit of Christ should be conveyed in practices, music, words, and rituals that are easily meaningful to people.  Churches need to be more strategic about how they use space, time, materials, and play to relate to their own mission fields. While there is a foreignness to the Christian message, it must be expressed indigenously.  On the other hand, he warns against having indigenous messages (adding a layer of religious reinforcement to the worst tendencies of our society).  He brings the reader to the question of what is Christ and what is culture?

Hunter also attacks the prevalence of clericalism, letting clergy do Christianity and evangelism for everyone else.  His book calls for laity to be let loose and take up the bulk of the work of ministry, including evangelism.  

A whole chapter is devoted to recovery ministries, and Hunter urges congregations to look at organizations like AA and find ways to model them.  He also encourages churches to examine the status of their hospitality and devotes several pages to the importance of quality conversations as a means of relating to people and persuading them.

It is a helpful book for a congregation that wants to get its laity more involved in ministry and be less dependent on the pastor.  

Jones, E. Stanley, The Christ of the Indian Road  (memoir, Christian mission, Christology, India)

Written almost 100 years ago (1925), we get acquainted with E. Stanley Jones, a gentle spirit, a sharp thinker, and a man who embodies much about the focus of his life: Jesus of Nazareth.  Jones had already been in India for 17 years when he wrote this memoir.  His time there coincided with the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, and the two were acquaintances and had several interactions.  

Jones’s critique of traditional Christian missionary work and institutional Christianity is devastating.  Sadly, his observations still apply.  India’s 19th and 20th century experiences of Christianity were tied in with English colonialism, racism, and entitlement.  Jones believed that Christianity had been portrayed exactly the opposite of who Jesus really was. Initially, he believed that his job was to present “cultural” Christianity to the Indian people, complete with justifications for the Old Testament, 20 centuries of Church history, and the entire Western civilization, “the whole line.”  Very quickly he realized he had to “shorten his line” and focus on the person and work of Jesus alone.  

The book is full of insightful phrases and telling illustrations. He tells how the Mayflower, after depositing the Pilgrims, left port to steal slaves from Africa, how a tribe of Saxons became baptized while holding their right hands out of the water… so they could continue to use their weapons contrary to the nonviolent Jesus. 

Jones very quickly settled on six rules for doing missionary work in India.  1) Do not attack other religions.  2) Show how Christianity is helps fulfill the yearnings of other ancient religions.  3) Start with topics that are familiar to all and bring Christian perspectives to the table.  4) Be absolutely frank, no hidden agendas.  5) Allow people to ask all the questions they want, express opinions, and engage in friendly argument.  6) Share Christ as an experience, not an argument or theory.

Jones believed that all people need three things:  1) an adequate goal for character development, 2) a full and free life, and 3) a connection with God.  If people had no connection with God, they would be vulnerable to devoting their lives to institutions and causes that would take life from them without giving back. Jones believed that a growing experience of Jesus, as portrayed in the gospels, was the surest path to each of those needs.  He shared with people out of love for them and identification with their needs, not out of his own sense of triumph.  

Jones firmly believed that Christianity and the institutional church could not hold Jesus.  He also believed that people need not give up their native religions entirely in order to put Christ first in their lives.  As with Judaism, Christ came to fulfill the Torah, not abolish it. The perfection and fulfillment of every great spiritual tradition can be found in the person of Jesus.  If only institutional Christianity could rediscover Jesus…  Jones devotes an entire chapter in this book to Gandhi and the similarities and differences between him and Jesus.  

A theory he promotes in his book is “Evangelize the inevitable.”  See where people are developing new powers and influence and spend time with those people, sharing the grace and love of Christ with them.  Jones was not afraid to relate to anyone, however rich, poor, powerful, powerless, or frightening.  

He is especially harsh on the American church for its racism and sexism, showing how practices in churches here have discredited the gospel message elsewhere.  Over and over he recalls individuals in India chiding Christians for being so unlike Jesus.  

His concept of “Christ of the Indian Road” invites people in India to picture Christ not as a westerner, but as one of their own who walks the roads of India.  As he encouraged people to envision Jesus as one relevant to their own culture, he noticed how much people were becoming attracted to the Jesus of the New Testament.

For all who whose Christianity needs a tune-up, this book will surely do the job.

Larson, Kate Clifford, Walk With Me:  A Biography of Fanny Lou Hamer  (biography)

Fannie Lou was her mother’s 20th and last child, one of them who lived into adulthood.  Born in rural Mississippi in 1917, far below any concept we have of poverty, and black.  Hamer begin picking cotton as a child, suffered malnourishment, gave away everything she had to her poor neighbors, and died in near poverty.  She was involuntarily sterilized, beaten, and raped by white men, and evicted by a white landlord for trying to vote. White men driving trucks slowly cruised by her house, occasionally shooting into it, bombing it once.  She was treated dismissively by Martin Luther King Jr. and other men in the civil rights movement for being a woman and only having a sixth grade education.  She was ignored by most black pastors in Mississippi for being a rabble rouser.  She was treated contemptuously by black power advocates for her resolute loyalty to non-violence and Christianity.  When appearing at the 1964 Democratic convention in 1964, after risking her life to integrate the all-white segregationist state party, she had to borrow a dress for the occasion.  Speaking eloquently, she electrified the nation.  Yet a queasy national party establishment still denied her a seat.  As time went on, she started a farm to feed the poor of her own country.  It failed.  She spoke up for the rights of women, but because she was anti-abortion, an issue deeply emotional for her due to being sterilized and seeing abortion used first hand as a way of genocide.  Leaders of the women’s movement dismissed her for her lack of “purity” on that issue.  She spoke openly against the Viet Nam War.  When she died, her grave went untended for years.

She wasn’t perfect.  But if our nation only has one national holiday to honor a singular individual, in my mind, it should not be January 15 for Martin Luther King, Jr., nor February 22 for George Washington, nor October 12 for Columbus.  It should be October 6 for Fanny Lou Hamer.  

Larson’s biography was my choice to observe “Black History Month.” It doesn’t hide Hamer’s faults.  It does make her real, inspiring, and empathetic. It gives us access to Hamer’s power for our own generation.

Messud, Claire, The Woman Upstairs (novel)

Messud’s novel centers around the private thoughts of a 42 year old single woman, Nora, a grade school teacher, who narrates a story about an intense relationship she had with an international family happening to spend a year in her community (Cambridge, Massachusetts.) The boy, Reza, was in her third grade class. The mother, Sirena, Italian, is a fairly well known artist, and the father, Skandar, Lebanese, is a scholar of history and ethics.

Nora’s “singleness” is foremost in her mind all the way through the telling of the story. The “woman upstairs” becomes her metaphor for how people see single women: nearby, but at the periphery of their lives, mostly invisible to others. People have weird emotional responses to adults who are “still” single past their late 30s. She is very conscious of being marginalized by those heavily occupied with families, and part of this story delves into her consequent needs and her ways of coping, sometimes with illusions.

She falls in love with each member of this family, separately, for different reasons. There is a strong sexual component to her love and fascination with both Sirena and Skandar. The eight year old boy is in her class and she develops a special fondness for him, one that pushes her past boundaries she sets up with all her other students. Her eventual infatuation with this family causes her to withdraw her intense focus on her teaching. Because Sirena is an artist, Nora’s own lifetime love of art is awakened. Nora has been building tiny model bedrooms of famous single women, such as Emily Dickenson.

As the novel proceeds, an intense relationship is developed with each family member. And then the family suddenly moves back to Europe, to Paris where they reside. Nora is left with her grief, her anger, her confusion, and her own self-disorientation. Something eventually happens near the end of the novel to make her feel betrayed, an event foreshadowed earlier in the story.

At that point she is left with her anger. Many people reviewing the book dislike Nora and are troubled by her anger. I didn’t share those feelings. While flawed, Nora tells a story that is both honest and wise. She is willing to take risks. While not always understanding her feelings, she expresses them well and gives the reader a chance to understand them. Her relationships with the family are complex and ring true, psychologically. They each become an illusion of the life she thinks she wants for herself. While many would say she has an infatuation, I prefer the term “illusion,” as it becomes a short-cut bypassing her own growth and integrity.

I am not at all uncomfortable with her anger, which grows throughout the novel. And at the end, it is her intense anger that gives me hope for her and causes me to respect her.

This is a hard book to read, as it is deeply reflective and the plot rather thin. Nora’s feelings may make many people uncomfortable. But it is a book full of perception in many areas of life, especially what it means to be single or to feel marginalized in other ways. It is worthy of a book club discussion.

Moriarty, Liane, Apples Never Fall (novel)

This is a mystery novel: a missing older wife, a husband who seems to be the primary suspect, four unmarried adult children who feel torn in their loyalty to their parents; and a mysterious 20-something woman who shows up at the older couple’s house, several months before the older woman goes missing.

The family is nuts about tennis. The parents ran a school to teach tennis, and one of their former pupils was even a winner at Wimbledon. The four adult children have all abandoned the sport, even though it was their entire life growing up.

I listened to the novel on Audible, where it is read by Caroline Lee, an actress whose Australian voice is mesmerizing for this midwesterner.

The characters become well known in the course of the novel, along with things that surprise us along the way. The young “mystery woman” is both entertaining and threatening. In addition to the suspense found in the story, it also provide good insights into human relationships and maturity.

Pinder-Amaker, Stephanie, and Wadsworth, Lauren, Did That Just Happen?!: Beyond “Diversity”–Creating Sustainable and Inclusive Organizations (cultural diversity, bigotry, rising identities)

I didn’t expect to give this book 5 stars when I picked it off my local library shelf. As a pastor of a church, as a white, cisgender, heterosexual male who cares about others experiences and wants to make our institutions more just and my own behavior more thoughtful, I picked it up out of duty.

The first part of the book consists of several stories of individuals who have experienced “Identity Related Aggression.” In other words, individuals they encountered made assumptions, based on “identity,” that resulted in insult or interference.

Written by two clinical psychologists, the book is tough, practical, smart, fair, and forward looking. I especially liked the “language” they offered to help me understand and identify how people are mistreated because of age, disability, mental health diagnosis, religion, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, national origin, citizenship status, gender identity, language, and gender expression. All these realities are referred to by the authors as “Rising Identities.”

One issue in American culture is the anger over “political correctness.” The authors’ careful use of language does not scold, but rather helps us speak more truthfully about realities that exist. A glossary at the end of the book is worth reading, even if one does not read the whole book.

But do read the whole book. The first section is “testimonial” as we say in the church. The second is analysis. And the third is prescriptive. The prescriptive section applies to those who are part of a people who have rising identities, those who lead organizations, and those who know they have offended from time to time.

The middle part of the book was most helpful. The authors call on us all to be better listeners. (a no brainer) But they help us out by pointing out the difference between Empowering Listening and Oppressive Listening. An oppressive listener refuses to be curious and broach the topic, tries to remain in the “expert” seat while listening to another person’s story, blames an unchangeable system for the problem, blames the victim, dominates the conversation with surprise and emotional outbursts, diminishes the other’s experience by making analogies, tries to fix the problem, justifies bigoted comments and actions by trying to explain the heart or “intent” of the offender, and jumps in to the be savior of the problem.

The authors are sympathetic to those who listen. We can hear so much sadness in another’s story that we feel compelled to cut off the listening and get started with the “solutions.”

The authors remind us that IRAs (Identity Related Aggressions) are often subconsciously engrained in individuals, organizations, and society itself. Work in any one area does have an impact in the other two, albeit slowly.

There is a good section on how people of rising identities have to make compromises to make it in systems that are oriented to exclude or inhibit them. People often have to hide who they truly are with others, an act that takes its toll through fatigue, discomfort, loss of joy, loss of self-actualization, loss of creativity, and burnout. Persons of color cannot hide that aspect of their identity, and so take to cross-switching when they are working in an organization or around people who are not persons of color.

The authors call on readers to proactively practice “cultural humility.” This is the realization that our own culture limits us from seeing and understanding experiences and phenomena from other cultures. Cultural humility recognizes how our own cultures limit our knowledge and wisdom and call on us to constantly be willing to learn what we don’t know: a lifelong task.

There is an intriguing section on the difference between an oppressive apology and an empowering one. An oppressive apology takes too long, makes excuses, focuses on the behavior and intent of the aggressor (rather than the effect on the person injured), makes the feelings of the apologizer paramount, prematurely asks for forgiveness and understanding. An oppressive apology forces the wronged person to take care of the one who did the wrong.

I’m fairly open minded and “up to date,” (even though my daughters often roll their eyes at me) and I found this book to be helpful and a growing experience. I’ll incorporate it into my work with churches and my writing.

Probulos, I.M., Jesus Returns July 13: Times Square New York (satire)

I picked this book because my birthday happens to be July 13. A satire, the story begins with Jesus entering earth’s atmosphere in a golden chariot being pulled by four white horses. All the major news networks cover the event, at first thinking a meteor is headed to earth, then discovering it is Jesus, landing in Times Square in New York City, ready to get on with the Judgement Day.

By the time Jesus finishes sending all offenders to hell (even Mike Pence is sent to hell for wearing mixed fabrics in his suits) the only people left are members of the Westboro Baptist Church, two Seventh Day Adventists, three Pentecostals, and Jack and Colleen from Davis, West Virginia. These righteous few then get in the chariot with Jesus and ride off to a better place.

Probulos sprinkles biblical quotes liberally throughout his short satire (less than 100 pages), having Jesus quote texts out of context to justify his judgments, just like many Christians take texts out of context.

While the book left a somewhat unpleasant aftertaste, I sensed two values in it. First, it might be a good book for a Sunday School class or Bible study group to read, to get them talking about HOW scripture should be interpreted. While the language and political opinions expressed in the satire are sure to offend many church folks, it does have the potential to stimulate some interesting conversations.

More importantly, for me however, is the vivid picture of what happens when there is a “break.” (After all, what could be more of a “break” than to send someone permanently to hell?) I am a United Methodist pastor, in a denomination that is rife with talk about breaking apart. There are many people in my denomination who are talking about “breaking away” from the rest of us because we have thoughts and behaviors they judge unbiblical or sinful. They want to leave us behind and ride off with Jesus in their new, pure denomination.

Many of my friends want to go with them. But I am worried about my friends. When you go with a group that kicks people out for not being correct or pure, or not effective enough, or not conforming, then how long will it be before YOU get the boot? Such an organization is birthed in a power struggle, and in the power struggles that are part of its DNA, who is to say whether you will be able to meet the standards of those who will ascend to authority?

This satire is an unpleasant reminder that when grace is evicted from our relationships, everything turns to hell. There is no safe place anymore, not even in a golden chariot with Jesus.

Stevenson, Robert Louis, Treasure Island (classic novel)

Embarrassed to say that this was the first time I’ve read this classic tale. A pirate comes to lodge at a boarding house run by Jim’s father. At his death, Jim discovers a map in the old pirate’s chest giving details on an island where pirates hid stolen treasure. When the map makes it into the hands of Jim’s older and better financed friends, an expedition is chartered to sail and recover the treasure. Along the way, not everyone turns out to be who Jim thought they were at first. The novel is filled with suspense, creativity, and interesting characters. Written in 1880 or so, the language takes one back 140 years and requires one to guess at a few idioms and picturesque phrases that are no longer in use. It was an enjoyable read and the narrative thrills were worth the time spent in the story.

Books Read in December 2021 and January 2022

Bird, Matt, The Secrets of Story:  Innovative Tools for Perfecting Your Fiction and Captivating Readers (Advice on writing stories for books, movies, and television) 

Elias, George Skaff, Characteristics of Games  (guidebook for game designers and creators)

McCollum, Vashti, One Woman’s Fight (history, legal, church vs. state, local history, memoir)

Newlyn, Lucy, The Craft of Poetry:  A Primer in Verse  (poetry, examples of types of poems and the craft of poetry)

Ryan, John Fuller, The Man Who Flew the Amerika Bomber    (novel)

Smith, Molly Dale, Transitional Ministry:  A Time of Opportunity

Towles, Amor, The Lincoln Highway  (novel)

Woods, Stuart, Grass Roots (political, crime novel)

Bird, Matt, The Secrets of Story:  Innovative Tools for Perfecting Your Fiction and Captivating Readers (Advice on writing stories for books, movies, and television) 

I listened to the book on audio (while I was driving) and plan to get a hardcopy from the library so I can take some notes.  I’m working on a novel, and Bird’s book is primarily about writing screenplays for movies and television.  About 40% seems to not apply to novel writing.  But the part that does includes the importance of irony (with one of the best explanations of it I’ve heard) and the craft of building suspense.  

Bird takes on a number of assumptions we make about audiences and readers, such as the expectations they have for surprise, good endings, and character flaws.  

His book includes a checklist of over 100 things for an author to ask about the book (screenplay.)

Bird also gives good, practical information about rewrites and revisions.

Many of his examples are from movies and TV shows, and his analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of those are fascinating, even for someone who doesn’t plan to write something.

Elias, George Skaff, Characteristics of Games  (guidebook for game designers and creators)

I read this book for two reasons: I’ve had a lifelong interest in inventing games, ever since I grew up in the country with three brothers and had to be creative for our own entertainment.  Second, I am a pastor who wanted to introduce ideas of church strategy to my leadership in a way that would be entertaining and pedagogically effective, and so I was working on a board game to that end.

This book helped me think systematically about the process.  It gave me terminology (much of it made up by the authors, I think) to understand what I was trying to do and name things I needed to do to make the game more entertaining.  

It included much more than I needed, and because I don’t play computer games, it left me disoriented at places from its constant references to them.  But on the whole, it was a fascinating and evocative book into games, why we enjoy some of them so much, and why we may tire or reject others.

McCollum, Vashti, One Woman’s Fight (history, legal, church vs. state, local history, memoir)

Vashti Cromwell McCollum was at the center of “separation of church and state” debate in my own community, eight years before I was born.  I had never heard of her until a friend loaned me Vashti’s memoir. The specific conflict was over whether the Champaign IL school district could use “release time” during the regular school day and invite local church approved instructors to take over the classrooms for it.  Students were not required to participate, but if they opted out, they had to leave the classroom and all their classmates and either wait in the hall or wait in another room and do their homework while the other students were evangelized.

Vashti did not agree with the theological tenets and proselitizing that was occurring, and so she refused to sign a permission slip for her son to participate.  The good Christian classmates who were receiving the indoctrination preceded to bully her son and the teacher blamed all of it on the boy and his mother for their refusal to conform. Vashti took the school to court on the grounds that the United States Constitution and the Illinois Constitution both forbade such mingling of church and state.

She describes the attacks on her and her family, both verbal and physical, from the Christians of the community and from Christians from around the country.  She also describes the court case in Urbana, county seat of Champaign County, and how she lost the case there.  She describes how she lost the case at the Illinois Supreme Court.  She describes how the case quickly was distorted from being a constitutional issue to an issue over her own religious ideas and practices.  (She was a secular humanist.)  The local newspaper, still in existence, attacked her personally in its headlines and reporting rather than fairly present the issue at hand.  

The case eventually went to the Supreme Court and she won, 8-1, in the first modern case that firmly established how separation of church and state should be applied to public schools.

The local religious leaders who led the effort to teach religion in the schools were in First Methodist Church in Champaign.  I am also a United Methodist pastor, and while I didn’t know the pastor who was at the center of this storm, I find myself embarrassed.  As a denomination, our leaders today would likely be standing alongside Vashti McCollum in her struggle for religious freedom.  But that was not the case in the 1940s.  

Church leaders in those days argued that they needed to teach religion in the schools to virtually captive audiences because they couldn’t get those kids and their families to come to church and receive such evangelism.  They argued that religious teaching in schools cut down on juvenile delinquency.  They argued that what they were teaching was “standard” and accepted by the majority of the people of the community.  They finally argued that it couldn’t do any harm.  But non-biased research into those assertions contraindicated the claims.  

It is an historical irony that the Methodists and other mainline denominations who tried so hard to use the schools to propagate their “majority” beliefs now find themselves attacked by a new majority in many communities:  the religious right.  If the religious right had its way, it would be indoctrinating students not only with theology that is often unethical, but also with political preferences that have nothing to do with Jesus of Nazareth.  I am grateful for the work that Vashti McCollum did, and for her courage.  But it is not a certainty that the rights she fought hard to win can continue to be taken for granted.

Newlyn, Lucy, The Craft of Poetry: A Primer in Verse (poetry, examples of types of poems and the craft of poetry)

Lucy Newlyn is a retired professor of English Literature from Oxford.  In this delightful and creative book of poetry, she teaches the craft of writing poetry, exclusively through her own poems.  

The poems are set in a rural English countryside and village of her childhood.  The “beck” (stream) that runs through the countryside is continually featured in her poems.  Having grown up in rural Northern Illinois, the poems stirred memories and imagination from my own childhood, as well as many resurrecting many places and events I have experienced since.  I borrowed the book from my library, but have ordered my own copy (even though I’m not buying all that many books in my retirement.)  I want to read in it, again and again, when my spirit needs to be comforted or uplifted.

In addition to the beck, she also vividly portrays sheep, farmers, the local pub, young lovers, newlyweds, death, memories of the past when trains went through the countryside, cheesemaking, meadows, long hours of wandering through hills, and the many times she crossed the beck to get to something she was seeking.

Each poem is titled by the concept she is illustrating:  rhyme, rhythm, symbol, metaphor, simile, echo, analogy, Iambic pentameter, Iambic tetrameter, half-rhyme, personification, oxymoron, hyperbole, anaphora, lyric, epic, epistle, Haiku, ballad, free verse…  There are 137 poetic concepts, each illustrated by one of her poems about this enchanted place.  There are no explanations of any of these concepts beyond the example given in the poem called by its name.  You will need another handbook to get definitions… or look them up on the internet.

It is a delightful and informative book, the poems are remarkable in their own right, and it is an overflowing guide to anyone who wants to write anything, not just poetry.

Ryan, John Fuller, The Man Who Flew the Amerika Bomber    (novel)

John Ryan brings his academic study of history and his many 1960s conversations with German war veterans into this novel, which in turn engages the reader in one of the lesser-known plots (never carried out) of the Nazi regime.  

The Germans developed several plans to bomb American cities during the war.  The distances, however, challenged the technology at that time.  Detroit was one of their target cities, due to the Detroit Arsenal Facility, which produced tanks, guns, canons, and trucks for the war.  The heart of Ryan’s story is a failed attempt to destroy Detroit.  

The hero is Max, a hereditary baron from Austria, drafted by the Nazis to fly planes in the war.  He soon becomes disillusioned by Hitler, then horrified as the war proceeds.  But he cannot escape, until he is put on a mission to destroy Detroit.  The plan had two parts:  first to fly reconnaissance over Detroit, publish photos, and scare Americans into bringing home their troops in Europe to defend American cities.  The second part of the plan was to actually bomb Detroit, as soon as the right bomb was developed.  Both plans involved flying to Detroit, turning back toward Maine, landing in the Atlantic, and getting rescued by German submarines cruising the American coastline.  Max subverts the reconnaissance plan and ends up living the rest of his life as a recluse in rural Maine.  

A reporter raised in the area (Peggy) is contacted by Max and begins to learn and write his story.  Her life is dramatically changed by what she learns.  If Max is the hero, Peggy is the protagonist of the novel.  

Ryan’s story moves along at a pleasing pace, is full of suspense, historical insight, pathos, surprising twists, engaging characters, and gently revealed romances.  In short, it is a very good read.

As a matter of full disclosure, John and I are both involved in a writer’s group and I had the opportunity to hear him read parts of his novel as he was writing and editing it.  The process our group followed only permitted him to read a few pages at a time, and all of us eagerly awaited the next week when we could hear more.  I had missed several of our meetings when John read, and was very satisfied to get to read his entire story from beginning to end.

Smith, Molly Dale, Transitional Ministry:  A Time of Opportunity

This is a nuts and bolts anthology describing how interim ministry works in several denominations, particularly Episcopalian, United Church of Christ, and Lutheran.  The writers are all part of a national network of interim pastors, pastors who serve congregations that are in between “settled” pastorates.  In addition to the nuts and bolts covered, in fine detail, the book also has several essays that provoke thought, particularly the one on appreciative inquiry.  As a pastor who has served in one interim appointment (in the United Methodist Church) and is heading into another, I found the book somewhat useful.  

The drawback for me came in that United Methodist pastors are assigned to congregations by a bishop.  The congregation has limited input on the skills they think they need, but virtually no input on “who” will be sent them.  As a consequence, a United Methodist interim pastor needs to work with a congregation that is quite powerless and deal with those real issues.  

On the whole, the book contained nuggets of insight and wisdom.  It’s main drawback was that is was entirely too prescriptive.

Towles, Amor, The Lincoln Highway  (novel)

This was my first Amor Towles novel.  It will not be my last.  The story starts in Nebraska with 18 year old Emmett returning home after a stint in juvenile detention.  His father has just died, the bankrupt family farm is about to be sold at auction, his mother has been missing for ten years, and his eight year old brother, Billy, needs Emmett’s care.  It is Emmett’s plan to leave town, head to a part of the country that is growing, and start life over as a carpenter.  The year is 1954.

But within hours of Emmett’s return, he discovers that two of his friends from the detention center have escaped and attached themselves to him.  One is slow-witted, gentle, generous, and comes from a wealthy family.  The other is a charming scamp who has had to survive abusive parents and a life on the run.  From that moment throughout the novel, these two friends drive Emmett and Billy’s lives.

There is a “girl next door” Sally, whom Emmett decides to leave out of his story.  But she is determined to work her way into it.  And then there is eight year old Billy, who is a bit of a mystic visionary.  He is well read, neurotic, and uncannily observant, and he stabilizes his brother and the other characters in the story.

The Lincoln Highway is Billy’s thing.  As he reads about the adventures and journeys of mythic and real heroes, he wants to find his own place in life by going on such a journey.  And he wants others to have heroic journeys as well.  The Lincoln Highway goes through Nebraska (it was the first continental highway built in the U.S. and is roughly what we know as Interstate 80 today, going from New York to San Francisco.)  Billy soon identify’s the Lincoln Highway as the venue for rebirth for himself and everyone else he knows in the story.  

It takes the brothers a long time to finally get on the Lincoln Highway.  Their ten day ordeal trying to get started on it is the setting of the novel.  The story includes compelling characters who draw you in, humor, a high degree of craziness that will necessitate suspension of disbelief now and then, suspense, twists and turns, sorrow, and relief.

Woods, Stuart, Grass Roots (political, crime novel)

Once in a while I like to put my mind in neutral and just go escape for the ride.  In this case, I let Stuart Woods help me disappear into his political thriller.  Grass Roots was written 32 years ago about a Georgia lawyer running for a senate seat in that state.  The novel itself has become an historical time piece:  it is assumed that a Democrat will win election in Georgia, it is pre-9/11, it is at the very beginning of DNA testing in criminal cases, and it comes from a time when those who lost close elections bowed out afterward, even if they were sleaze-bags.  

The story strains credibility, but I gave all that a pass because I just wanted to live in its narrative, full of political suspense, courtroom drama, assassination of candidates, hot sex scenes, fragile romances, and gunfights.  

It’s the first Will Lee novel I read, and when I’m ready for an escape from reality, I’ll likely listen to another.

Strout, Elizabeth, My Name Is Lucy Barton (novel)

I read this novel because it is the first of a trilogy, and my eye caught the other two books, so I decided to read this first. I probably won’t go on to read the other two, unless I get more incentive.

This novel has no plot, but rather focuses on the muted feelings of Lucy Barton, who spends most of the novel with her mother sitting at her feet. The two of them have little dialogue. They occasionally remember back to people and places they shared, but there is little sense of love between them, even though they both profess it. Their professions lack credibility.

As Lucy Barton tells bits and pieces of her story, I felt sad for her, but not empathetic. This was strange because I am usually very quick with empathy. Perhaps it was a technique of the author, to put me into the same relationship with Lucy as her mother seems to have. I spent the whole book listening to her story, not really hearing enough of it to understand her, and not really motivated to find out more.